Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ickes: We want the Michigan uncommitted to stay uncommitted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nonobadfish Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:05 PM
Original message
Ickes: We want the Michigan uncommitted to stay uncommitted
WTH?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/

Ickes: We want the Michigan uncommitted to stay uncommitted


In a conference call with reporters, Clinton Senior Adviser Harold Ickes clarified their position on Michigan -- they don't want the 55 "uncommitted" delegates to go to Obama (his name did not appear on the ballot in Michigan).

There have been reports that some of the uncommitted delegates in Michigan already selected are union supporters of Clinton. This solution, unsurprisingly, would make it much harder for Obama to clinch a pledged delegate majority.

Last week, the Clinton campaign was agnostic on the issue -- but they seem to ratcheting up the noise, or at least their negotiating position.

Ickes also mentions that the co-chairs of the Rules and Bylaws Committee -- which will rule on Florida and Michigan on May 31 -- have been holding "informal meetings" with leaders of both of the campaigns.

UPDATE: Wolfson says that most -- if not -- all of the uncommitted delegates would likely go for Obama.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're just trying to find any excuse to keep dragging this out, in hopes Obama
gets hit by lightning or run over by a reindeer or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is some low down dirty politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenEyedLefty Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Harold Ickes
Has a rather appropriate name, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. They're trying to cut Obama's pledged delegate lead under 100
Edited on Thu May-22-08 12:53 PM by IWantAnyDem
It's that simple.

They believe they can win a floor fight if they get the pledged delegate difference under 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonobadfish Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. He also defends his position by saying that FL/MI have already been punished. Anyone know how?
http://thepage.time.com/2008/05/22/clinton-camp-to-keep-up-florida-michigan-arguments-thursday/

Senior advisor Harold Ickes and spokesstrategist Howard Wolfson hold morning media call.

Ickes reiterates position that the Clinton camp wants all delegates from both states to be seated with a full vote.

Also defends voting for the Florida, Michigan sanctions as a DNC member in the first place, says punishment was imposed and it’s time to make sure the two states are included in general.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can the Clinton organization get any more slimey?
This is really fucked up stuff they are trying to get away with.
Shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC