Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sit FL and MI delegates - Hillary still loses by 63

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
warpigs Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:35 PM
Original message
Sit FL and MI delegates - Hillary still loses by 63
According to the CNN website

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/

O Pledged 1658 Super 307 Total 1965
H Pledged 1500 Super 279 Total 1779

If you add Florida

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#FL

H gets 106 O gets 70 (assume Edwards is not counted)
106 = .50 X 211
70 = .33 X 211

If you add Michigan

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#MI

H gets 86 O get 0
86 = 0.55 X 157

Adding these to the current totals:

O Pledged 1728 Super 307 Total 2035
H Pledged 1693 Super 279 Total 1972

H still loses.

Am I missing something?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, you are missing the undecided superdelegates
They hold the key to this whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Funny how they keep turning into Obama endorsers
How many of Obama's SDs have switched to Clinton? Why has he picked up so many more endorsements as the campaign goes on? Why would anyone think they're going to go Clinton's way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. If they are Obama supporters, they could end this thing now
What are they waiting for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Think about it....it makes logical sense
they pile on and come out in support of Obama now with only 2-weeks left and it looks like "the boys club" is trying to put the woman back in the kitchen, thus dividing the party in a hard way that will make it difficult for Obama to heal...i was predicting this way back. It is best for them to wait until June 4th before coming out (and lets not forget the May 31st thing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsomuah Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. They aren't Obama supporters per se
They are politicians who are being prudent.

Many of the supers remaining are people like Nancy and Harry Reid, and Jimmy Carter who already have a candidate preference but refrain from making a public endorsement because they need to appear impartial or they don't want to damage their relationships with the candidate they plan to vote against. Some of them have hinted at their preference: For example, the Clinton campaign has said it believes Pelosi is privately an Obama supporter and Carter has hinted that he is an Obama supporter, but neither of them will endorse until all the primaries are over and we know what the final numbers look like, and settle the question of Florida and Michigan. Then most of them will probably just endorse whoever happens to be the winner at that point.

Remember that George Bush didn't endorse McCain until he mathematically clinched the nomination even though it was obvious for weeks before that, that McCain would be the nominee. I don't believe Bush nominated McCain because that's who he supports. He just endorsed the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warpigs Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. OK got it
There are 180 remaining unpledged Supers out of 766 total.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/02/delegate.explainer/index.html


If FL and MI are seated as I mentioned before there would be a total of 4187 total delegates or 2094 for nomination. Obama would need 33% or 59 of SDs to win in the case that FL and MI are seated in the way I described.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Don't we also have to add some supers if we add FL and MI?
I thought the 766 number did not include the supers from FL and MI

I've seen the number 797 which might be the difference (31 supers for MI and FL)

But I have REAL trouble seating FL and MI without consequence.

Then how will we ever enforce the rules in the future?

We'll start having primaries in the summer of 2011 or even 2010. Hell, we could be holding primaries right after the inaguration.

And of course, New Hampshire will be first. (It's in their constitution).

I wouldn't mind a wholesale rewrite of the rules, something that gives states other than Iowa and NH such a big voice in picking the prez. But this year we need to stick to the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. And then it will suddenly be about the popular vote.
Edited on Thu May-22-08 02:43 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
And how delegates aren't REALLY democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does she get the popular vote then?
Because that will be her mantra.

How can she say that Michigan voters who voted uncommitted cannot be counted because they were told to vote like that if they supported Obama or Edwards?

Is that not Zimbabwe-like?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why reward cheaters?
The Michigan and Florida Democratic Leadership wanted to cheat. The only way to seat the delegates fairly is to summarily fire and replace all those that thought it was a good idea to disenfranchise their voters in their states by breaking the rules.

If they pay some sort of fine as well, perhaps then they could get seated. Otherwise, it's set a precedent later that states can do whatever they want...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Indeed. There really is an order that needs to be upheld here. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I say give her Florida if it will make her stop this foolishness.
It's lost to us this year in November.

Not MI though. We still have a chance of winning Michigan in November. I'm not ready to toss them under the bus yet an disenfranchise all the voters who didn't vote for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, you are. The number to nominate, if you include FL & MI
goes up to 2209. It does not remain at 2025.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Of course if you add FL and MI, the number needed is 2210
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. And you can be assured the SDs will come out in droves to make this moot
Edited on Thu May-22-08 02:53 PM by quantass
because the last thing they want is a non-presumptive leading up to the convention...they will have picked their "offical" nominee on June 4th and their is nothing Hillary can do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nothing HRC can do, true, but don't hold your breath that the SD's will close it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. YOu should only give Fl and Mi 1/2 delegates. Those are the rules and GOP did that, too.
They can not expect anything more than 1/2 delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Get over it. They will be seated as they voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC