Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama’s Secret War Profiteering Tax (Palast)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:51 PM
Original message
Obama’s Secret War Profiteering Tax (Palast)
more: http://www.gregpalast.com/obama%E2%80%99s-secret-war-profiteering-tax/

http://www.gregpalast.com/obama%E2%80%99s-secret-war-profiteering-tax/
Obama’s Secret War Profiteering Tax

By Greg Palast for TomPaine.com/OurFuture.org

I can’t make this up:

In a hotel room in Brussels, the chief executives of the world’s top oil companies unrolled a huge map of the Middle East, drew a fat, red line around Iraq and signed their names to it.

The map, the red line, the secret signatures. It explains this war. It explains this week’s rocketing of the price of oil to $134 a barrel.

It happened on July 31, 1928, but the bill came due now.

Barack Obama knows this. Or, just as important, those crafting his policies seem to know this. Same for Hillary Clinton’s team. There could be no more vital difference between the Republican and Democratic candidacies. And you won’t learn a thing about it on the news from the Fox-holes.

Let me explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. entirely logical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good article.
"More important than even the Democrats’ declaring that oil company profits are undeserved, is their implicit understanding that the profits are the spoils of war. And that’s another reason to tax the oil industry’s ill-gotten gain. Vietnam showed us that foreign wars don’t end when the invader can no longer fight, but when the invasion is no longer profitable."

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "no longer profitable"-yep, that's the way it's always been....
it's not rocket science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The good bits
Obama’s war profiteering tax, or “oil windfall profits” tax, would equal just 20% of the industry’s charges in excess of $80 a barrel. It’s embarrassingly small actually, smaller than every windfall tax charged by every other nation. (Ecuador, for example, captures up to 99% of the higher earnings).

Nevertheless, oilman George W. Bush opposes it as does Bush’s man McCain. Senator McCain admonishes us that the po’ widdle oil companies need more than 80% of their windfall so they can explore for more oil. When pigs fly, Senator. Last year, Exxon spent $36 billion of its $40 billion income on dividends and special payouts to stockholders in tax-free buy-backs. Even the Journal called Exxon’s capital investment spending “stingy.”

At today’s prices Obama’s windfall tax, teeny as it is, would bring in nearly a billion dollars a day for the US Treasury. Clinton’s plan is similar. Yet the press’ entire discussion of gas prices is shifted to whether the government should knock some sales tax pennies off the oil companies’ pillaging at the pump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattP Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't buy it
I like Palast and some of his stuff is good but some of it is tin-foil hat time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So what's YOUR theory about Exxon Mobil's $40.6 BILLION profit and $2 TRILLION
in oil reserves?

And "some of it is tin-foil hat time" requires a couple of "for instances." Please name the "tin-foil hat" Palast columns that you are referring to. And, when you say "I don't buy it" (his oil/war theory) and then say "some of his stuff" is "tin-foil," ARE you saying that his oil/war theory is "tinfoil," or do you have logical arguments and facts with which to refute it? You don't "buy it." Why not? Or--if you thinks it's "tinfoil" (too...um, conspiratorial for oil corporations to be guilty of)--crazy, far-out, paranoid, not to be taken seriously--what, specifically, in the article strikes you that way?

Yeah, I'm being somewhat sarcastic about your cryptic, uninformative comment. But I'm also serious. I really want to know your answers to the the above questions. I read it, and it didn't strike me in the least as "tinfoil."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. This is what I tell my Republican brother all the time
The oil companies helped Bush* get selected. This is their last opportunity to reap benefits for all the financial support that gave his campaign in 2000. So they are getting as much as they can this last year because THEY EARNED IT by helping him step into the Oval Office.

Get it while you can before the "well" runs dry.

Sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What's not to buy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC