Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

6:35 am cst: CNN Breaking News: The two campaigns are in talks right now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:36 AM
Original message
6:35 am cst: CNN Breaking News: The two campaigns are in talks right now
Suzanne Malveaux is reporting by phone that Obama and Clinton are discussing Clinton's exit strategy and potentially the VP slot. I'll post a link as soon as I find one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. CNN said Obama was adamant about NOT offering the VP
Edited on Fri May-23-08 06:46 AM by TexasObserver
CNN = Clinton News Network

This is a story from Hillary's camp, the point of which is to say "Obama must offer Hillary the VP!"

Guess what, Hillary? You're never going to be on that ticket!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Obama doesn't have a choice...If Hillary wants the #2 spot, it's hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. bullshit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yeah, what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yeah, what they said...BULLSHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
40. Me four
Hil lost any "right" to be Obama's VP when she started giving aid & comfort to the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. That is simply not true.
The choice is Obama's. Others can try to exert influence, but it is his choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. Yes it is! He READ it somewhere!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
47. A recent thread on
this forum provided unintentional proof that Mark Twain was correct when he said that the problem in the world today is not one of ignorance, but rather of people knowing so darned much that just ain't so. There are super delegates who may be telling the Obama campaign that they will endorse Obama if he will agree to put Clinton on the ticket. But that is distinct from the super delegates having the authority to force a VP on Obama at the convention, who he does not want. A shallow grasp of the issues creates confusion for some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. sorry, but that's not necessarily so
It depends on how many of the delegates think a unity ticket is a good idea. The VP choice has to be voted on by the delegates and competing nominations can be made. While a majority of the delegates are going to support Obama as the presidential nominee, he doesn't "control" a majority of the delegates. Its impossible to predict how many of the SDs that support Obama (or, for that matter, how many of the pledged delegates) think a unity ticket is a good idea and would support HRC if her name was placed into nomination on the convention floor, even in opposition to Obama's choice.

In other words, delegates exercise free will -- they typically go along with the presidential nominee's vp selection because, after all, in most instances, a clear majority of the delegates are loyal to the presidential nominee. Whether that is the case this year, or whether a significant number of SDs (and pledged delegates) may think that a unity ticket is a good thing -- well, that's the wild card.

As I've said elsewhere, I don't think HRC wants the number two spot, certainly not enough to put the party through a bruising floor fight that she more than likely would lose (and that, even if she won, would be extremely damaging).

So, in the end, it probably is Obama's choice, but in a sense, its up to HRC to allow it to be so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #37
49. In fact,
that is inaccurate. You cannot name a single time when either the republican or democratic convention forced a VP on any presidential candidate.

Super delegates can attempt to exercise influence before the convention. More, it is true that some of the super delegates who are still officially "undecided" are expressing their opinion that a unity ticket is now in the best interests of the party. There are certainly valid points that can be raised, either pro or con, regarding this option.

People who are interested in the actual process would enjoy reading any number of Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.'s books, perhaps none more so than the recently released "Journals: 1952-2000."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. You are doing "math" now.
In Hillarese. a "snow-balls chance in hell" = YOU CAN'T STOP HER!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. The choice is nominally Obama's...
...but he is not the sort of fool who would ignore Clinton's massive support. Of course he's considered her for VP, and if he's ruled her out, it's for a very good reason. Ego alone won't drive that decision, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. As he has said
many times, Senator Clinton would be on anyone's "shortlist" for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Wrong...as Pelosi said she can't be forced on him if he doesn't want her. VP is very personal
choice for a presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Ah yes, she's inevitable...seems to me I've heard that one before
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Nope. This is the one thing the Clintons will not get in their lives
Their power is diminished. The fresh air is blowing in, finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. HA HA HA HA HA!!! Ohh, my ribs.
That one hurt, it was so funny.

The nomination was hers, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
35. Do you goobers ever think for yourselves
Or do you just repeat each other?

Seriously, though, is it somehow comforting to say the same thing over and over, or is it a nervous tick? It'd hate to make fun of someone's disability.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
36. This just isn't true. Obama will control the floor at the covention. She can't bully herself onto
the ticket without the floor's support of her canidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yotun Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
38. Not only is it NOT her choice to make, I believe most of the party high-ups like Dean, Pelosi, Gore
do NOT want her on the ticket anyway, so who's going to force her on Obama?

And is it a good idea anyway? Polls show 50% of her supporters not voting for Obama come the fall. But those come from WV and KY polls- we'd expect the numbers are hardly representative of the nation. So say 33% of her voters nation wide are saying they will not vote Obama come fall. We can expect some to change their mind come fall. So 25% may actually make up on their promise ( a huge figure actually but- whatever). POlls now nationally show her at around 40% of national support amongst democrats. 25% of that is 10%. Is it worth it for Obama to take Clinton on the ticket just to secure 10% of the democratic vote (and some of that my still not vote for him anyway, their attitude being more anti-Obama than pro-Clitnon)? GIVEN the large negatives she brings such as:

1)If Republicans are now disenfranchised with their party and many willing to seat the election home, if there's one thing that will make them come out in droves to vote is a ticket with not only a black man there with the name of Hussein, but Hillary Clinton on as well!
2) I can hardly imagine ANY independent or Republican who is now considering voting democrat who will do so if Hillary is on the ticket.

Summing up, Hillary does not bring on the ticket nothing other than a small assurance that some of her supporters won't sit the election out, while it brings massive negatives on the ticket.

BUT at the end of the day, we must think of the good of the nation first. The VP slot should not only be considered as part of what makes for a good electoral victory- but will the VP be able to work harmoniously with the president to provide good results and policies for the country. Even if political consideration made Hillary a good electoral choise (which they don't) they do not make her a practical choice as far as ability to work with Obama goes. The two characters are at odds, and I honestly believe the two in fact hate the guts out of each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
46. Double bullshit.
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
55. Complete, total, utter horseshit. He doesn't HAVE to accept ANYONE...
Least of all the nasty piece of work that has been slagging him off for 15 months...


Fuck that noise...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
58. Bull. If he's the nominee he doesn't have to give her shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
62. Contrary to what Hillary and her fans think, Hillary doesn't automatically get what Hillary wants.
That was one big problem with her campaign from the get-go. She thought she was automatically entitled to the nomination, despite the fact that an enormous chunk of the population of the United States can't stand her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. MSNBC is hyping a NYT story on their home page...
About Bill Clinton now supposedly pimping this idea. :crazy:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24785209/
While Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and her advisers insist that she is determined to win the Democratic nomination, friends of the couple say that former President Bill Clinton , for one, has begun privately contemplating a different outcome for her: As Senator Barack Obama ’s running mate.

Yet anyone who knows the Clintons is well aware that, at times, they come to politics with different motivations. Both of them want to return to the White House; Mrs. Clinton, of New York, also enjoys being a senator, while Mr. Clinton, according to associates, sees the vice presidency as perhaps her best path to becoming president someday if she loses the nominating fight. And Mr. Clinton has his own ideas about his wife’s best interests — even if she sometimes does not share them.


So there we have it, once again it's about Clinton becoming President, not the good of the country/party/people/whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. All of these stories are planted by the Hillary campaign.
We're supposed to think that Hillary is only thinking about the presidency, and that only those around her are pushing the VP idea. All part of the delusion that is Hillary.

She's nuts, and she's getting nuttier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. Yup! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. I sure hope this is true.
It will be nice to see this end so we can begin the General Election fight. I would love to see them both on the same ticket. At least we would have a chance against McCain. Thanks for letting us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. the only thing that frustrates me about the timing....
is that the networks are FINALLY dumping on McCain for his "evangelical problem" as they call it PLUS the McCain medical dump is today. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. And by talks about the potential VP slot
It's obvious that those talks consist of Obama telling her no way. Why else would his campaign leak out info yesterday that he was starting the V.P. selection process? Also, even if you don't follow my logic, commonsense still tells us that Hillary would be on his short list, so of course he would talk to her about the V.P. position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. Axlerod said on "Morning Joe" that this was premature,
as the nomination was not Obama's yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #44
54. "premature" and "presumptuous"
I swear I'm gonna go crazy the next time a politician uses either of these words. They're being disingenuous and are just avoiding the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Clinton News Network - am I surprised this non-news is getting aired? - n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. after this never ending primary, hearing of an exit strategy is newsworthy imo
assuming it's true of course.

I'm ready to get this part over with and start on the general race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. I'm with you but her ties to the MIC are unnerving... I'm not alone wanting her offstage
...imagine the worst

you get my drift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. MSNBC: Axlerod slams those rumors and says NOT US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Is he saying the camps are not in communication at all, or just not about VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
51. I understand him to be debunking the rumor that the camps were talking at all.
My sense was he came on to stomp out the story Hillary had just let loose in print and TV media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
43. ah, so CNN was wrong in their reporting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. David Axelrod on MSNBC live now - debunking VP rumor.
Whatever CNN is reporting isn't true according to him. One never knows though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. I asked above, is Axelrod denying talks or just talks about VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. He never actually said they weren't talking.
He did address the VP rumor though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Do you mean the Obama campaign may actually be lying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Not disclosing at this point.
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:07 AM by sparosnare
The camps may very well be in negotiations, he didn't deny that - however he did deny the VP rumor. He doesn't need to admit they're talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
45. oh, ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Any time now....
The wailing and gnashing will begin.

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. Begin? Your side has been wailing and gnashing for weeks if not months.
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:22 AM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #33
61. You ain't seen nothin yet!
Edited on Fri May-23-08 10:09 AM by susankh4
There are actually people on this board that owe me $$$ if the unity ticket comes to be. I'd say that's pretty smug... to bet actual bucks on who someone won't choose for VP.


Prepare for the apocolypse....


:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

Tis immanent.


:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. I have to agree with some of the others
this is nothing but a planted story to get Clinton on the ticket. How many times do you have to be told no?

She is not owed a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. "A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s campaign said Thursday ---
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:14 AM by IDemo
that Mr. Clinton had not had private conversations in which he was pushing her for the vice presidency or arguing that she deserved it, and that he believed the choice of a running mate was a personal one for the nominee."

No, really???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. What are they doing up so early
and how do people know this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
31. What are they doing up so early
and how do people know this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
34. Is this the meeting where only one will leave the room that Olberman talked about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
39. Well, that WOULD explain the non-movement of supers yesterday
I doubt the part about discussing veep but I think there probably are some talks going on, maybe about Hillary's role as a cabinet member, senate leader, influence in DNC, etc. Putting her in charge of health care reform might just be the kind of thing she'd really like. Despite her failure the first time around as First Lady with health care, I think if she could get that done now she'd have a legacy of her own that rivals that of being a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
41. interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
48. Suzanne Malveaux is not a reporter to be trusted
She's wrong more than she's right. And I definitely would take any "scoop" from her with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
52. They probably meeting to neg. FL and MI outcomes
... I doubt this is about VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. You are probably closer to the truth...Obama knows that if she's on the ticket he loses control..
...will have to reign in BOTH Clinton's constantly and will almost certainly lose his "change for America" donors aka Dems sick of the DLC...

It makes sense that this is about how FL and MI get represented and how Hillary will claim the praise for "re-enfranchising" the voters and then gracefully and quietly exit the stage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
53. The scoop is that the exit strategy is the key sticking point.
They're arguing about whether to give her a parachute.

Or not.

Just a joke. Ha ha ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
57. Here's A Link
Clinton Campaign in Talks With Obama About VP Slot, CNN Says

By Chris Dolmetsch

May 23 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign is in formal talks with Senator Barack Obama's campaign about becoming his vice presidential running mate, CNN reported, without citing anyone specific.

The two Democratic campaigns are talking about ways for Clinton, from New York, to drop her bid for president that may include joining the Illinois senator's ticket, CNN reported. Talks are in a ``very preliminary'' stage and are described as ``difficult,'' the network said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=apUvejwrj_bw&refer=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
59. LBJ: "I would rather have my enemies inside my tent pissing out - then outside my tent pissing in"
At least to some extent, that is the essence of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC