Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Raw Story reports on the behind the scenes dealings between the 2 camps over the VP spot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:08 AM
Original message
Raw Story reports on the behind the scenes dealings between the 2 camps over the VP spot
interesting stuff, although I do consider that their source is a Clinton insider.

http://rawstory.com/rawreplay/?p=1119
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. A public offering is a trick.
See: Kennedy-Johnson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe the dealings are along the lines of who other than Hillary they will be happy with as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That would be a better option, let her have a say in the VP selection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Consequences...
What they’ve done is they have reached out and presented Obama insiders with three possible scenarios. they say obama can ignore clinton and her supporters and make this vice-presidential offer to someone else, which several people say would be a total dismissal of her. It is considered unacceptable. One person told me this could mean open civil war within the party, and so they believe that this is scenario number one is going to have consequences.


Yes, it will have consequences if he ignores her and her supporters.

Just as it would if the situation were reversed and she ignored Obama and his supporters.

I don't know why so many Obama supporters here have so much trouble understanding that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Threats to take down the party, if they don't get their way
shows what a horrible person she is, and how lucky we all are. Imagine such an ammoral person as president, oh wait we don't have to imagine, we have george bush as a perfect example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not a threat, just a statement of the effect it's likely to have in the GE if Obama acts as though
it doesn't matter that approximately half the votes cast in the primaries went to her.

It's wise to put your strongest primary opponent on the ticket, especially when the race has been this close. Best way to show that he would like her supporters' votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's a threat, because ONLY the Clintons could start a civil war
Never have I seen such a sore loser, as the Clintons. I honestly hope she loses her Senate seat, I wouldn't even care if it was to a republican (as long as it didn't swing the majority away from the Dems).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You're in the bargaining phase. This too shall pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. If she hadn't ratcheted up the rhetoric to such toxic levels
she might have had a chance.

But you do not put someone on the ticket who has already claimed that you are less qualified to be President than your Republican opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. I'm extremely insulted that you have a true hero in your Avatar: Al Gore...
Where were the Clintons when the Election of 2000 was stolen from him? You disgrace his honor through your blind support for Hillary Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. Where are the threats to take down the party?
:shrug: I think those were just hypotheticals being discussed.

As I see it, Obama will reach out after he has it sewn up (which he basically has now) to Hillary and her camp and Hillary will have to accept. Otherwise she would be committing political suicide (and that's not the clinton's style).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. And the consequences of her running an incredibly negative campaign...
is her NOT being offered the VP slot.

So why is it unacceptable for HRC & Co to reap what they sow? Now you are suggesting that Obama will have to pay the consequences of her own actions. She created this problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It was a catch 22 for her. She couldn't stay close unless she went more negative
than you should (in a primary) and if she didn't get close she wouldn't be in position to demand a VP slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's his choice, not hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. I heard this argument last night
you know - if people are going to be foolish enough to align their loyalty to Hillary than to their country and themselves - what choice is there but just to let stupid people remain stupid. There will be enough of the more intelligent people that Obama neededn't worry about the Hillary psychos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Garbage. She lost. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. More lies from the Clinton Camp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. I don't see how he can pick her and not validate her "not ready" argument.
I'd like to not believe this story. It conflicts with my prejudices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. remember all those rumors about Edwards endorsing Clinton?
That was floated from the Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. This reminds me of something.......
hmm... what is it???

oh yeah... a toddler sitting in the basket of the grocery cart, looking at the candy, whining for the candy, letting mama know that if she doesn't get candy she will start to scream and pout. If she's really been indulged in the past she may even be thinking about hitting mama or throwing candy around hurting other shoppers.

Now we've all seen these kinds of situations... heaven's, I've been there more times than my pride would even allow me to admit in a public forum:blush: Mama has a choice, she can fearfully give in, buy the candy and avoid embarrassment (although to me, this type of tactic always ends up humiliating the parent more in the long run.) Or the parent can choose to be the adult in control of the situation... calmly repeat to the child that, "no, we are not buying candy today." And when she fusses and whines and escalates mama just smiles blandly, maybe apologizes quietly to other shoppers for the disturbance, maybe removes the child from the situation. But she doesn't give in, because she knows that that is the worst thing she could do to this child, and to all of her other children who are watching the whole scenario play out and are taking notes;)


How have we sunk to this place, I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Sadly the comparison between Hillary and a spoiled child are becoming
more and more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. Interesting.
They say it doesn’t mean that Clinton would not campaign for Obama, that she would, but she would do so like her husband did campaigning for Gore, quite aloof.

This pretty much sounds like what's going to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. EXACTLY!! Aloof and half-heartedly like they did for both Gore AND Kerry!
Edited on Fri May-23-08 09:00 AM by Liberal_Stalwart71
They show no outrage for the stolen elections of 2000 and 2004. They show no contempt for the Bush administration; in fact, Bill and Pappy Bush are best buddies, golfing together and licking each other's ass.

Then, Hillary turns around and insults Gore and Kerry by insinuating that they "lost" because they are elitist, a subtle reference to and dig at Obama.

All those years spent defending the Clintons and few could understand why the Republicans hated them so much. Now I understand why!

The Clintons are like KKKarl Rove and the Bushes! They are NOT to be trusted!!!

TO HELL WITH DLC SCUM!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Unless they have something to gain, they have zero desire to contribute
a very selfish and self centered couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Yep. And we don't need that sort of campaigning. I'd rather not have it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Sounds a lot like the Saturday Night Live sketch that some people mocked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. threats...
from a loser. Pathetic.

They say it doesn’t mean that Clinton would not campaign for Obama, that she would, but she would do so like her husband did campaigning for Gore, quite aloof. They also say perhaps women’s groups will be less willing to raise money for Obama.


here's Hillary campaigning for John Kerry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk1k0nUWEQg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Doesn't this sound like the SNL bit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Campaigning half-heartedly and certainly not with any enthusiasm...
Edited on Fri May-23-08 09:33 AM by Liberal_Stalwart71
Hill and Bill have been planning for her presidency for years. Their sense of entitlement is amazing. And it's sad that their supporters--particularly the women's groups--can't see through the deceit. As a black woman, I am deeply depressed that this election has created an unhealthy schism between women and blacks. And many black women are standing on the sidelines with our hands up in the air!! This is very, very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I see many of Hillary's supporters are supporting her on an emotional basis (at this point)
reason and logic are lost to them. My hope is that time heals all wounds and they will come to their senses and come to understand the big picture.

As for the Clintons they have shown to be self serving and self centered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC