So...here's what I just posted...that got no interest on DU...but I only post what I'm thinking is something others might want to think about.
So...I'll throw it out here, for you...since you asked for opinions:
------
KoKo01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May-23-08 07:39 PM
Original message
I wouldn't dismiss the NYPOST article on Obama having problems
Edited on Fri May-23-08 07:44 PM by KoKo01
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05232008/news/nationalnews /...
The possibility of some "lone RW Shooter" going after Obama is very much diminished by the Secret Service who learned from the JFK Assassination and through Reagan and Beyond...they seem to know exactly how to pin point some "would be assasinator" in the crowd or on the road or in the Plane.
Much has been done with "electronic surveillance methods" that we (the Public) are not aware of and won't be made aware of...so Obama is probably safe because some "Drone will come outta the sky" and bomb to smithereens anyone trying to go at him, if a savvy "SS AGENT" doesn't manage to blow away the perp before that's necessary.
BUT...the fact that Dems need a "back up" in the event of some other event..(like Repugs managing to do another Swift Boat)...but on MASSIVE SCALE" that would be far greater than they did with Kerry, is not beyond realm of possibility.
I don't think Hillary/Bill is wrong in thinking this because THEY KNOW...what can happen much better than the rest of us about what can be put against Obama. REMEMBER!!! They served in the WH and had the "RW Kitchen Sink and the Whole House" thrown against them. THEY KNOW! Plus...what "IF" Monica was a PLANT and they KNOW IT?
I would listen to them... :shrug: They've lived through the worst since Watergate of what RW will through at a Democratic Candidate and President.
----
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=6097716&mesg_id=6097716