Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's trying to make a point about statistical improbability into a "calendric" point.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:20 AM
Original message
Hillary's trying to make a point about statistical improbability into a "calendric" point.
Nobody's really catching this. She's creating a strawman--people aren't asking her to get out of the race just because June is late in the year.

It has a lot to do with the delegate count, which is all but mathematically impossible for her to overcome. Lost in this latest "gaffe" is Hillary's attempt to shift the argument from delegate count, to time of year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me guess: It's not The Math, it's The Calendar.
Before the Calendar, it was The Map

Ever get the impression that Hillary is just going through every app on her iPhone, looking for one that will tell her she's winning?

Next: It's not The Math, it's The Solitaire!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hillary's the sort of person who would cheat at solitaire
If such a thing were possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. EDITORIAL - TOON HERE




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Quite true. And no one would care at all if she wasn't trying to trash our
nominee at the same time.

She's grasping at straws and lashing out at everyone - the opponent, the media, supposed
"sexists", etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Her "examples" were off and showed more hypocrisy. RFK only got IN the race 6 weeks before he got
assassinated and Bill Clinton had the nomination wrapped up months earlier than June. ALSO, as Tim Russert pointed out, HE claimed on tv, in March or April of '92, that Bill Clinton had the nomination wrapped up and the Clintons thought he was a mathematical GENIUS back THEN (since the count favored Bill Clinton), but now that it's OBAMA in that winning position, the Clintons are claiming media bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC