Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Michigan 36 - Obama gets 18 (demconwatch.blogspot.com)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:26 PM
Original message
The Michigan 36 - Obama gets 18 (demconwatch.blogspot.com)
Edited on Tue May-27-08 10:31 PM by swag
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/05/michigan-36-obama-gets-18.html

Michigan selected 36 Uncommitted delegates at their District Conventions in April. The state of these 36 delegates, specifically whether they have officially endorsed Obama, has become important in advance of this weekend's RBC meeting. Knowing how many of the 36 are committed to Obama could make the difference in what type of deal the Obama campaign is willing to accept. We asked our readers to help us out, and they did.

Information was hard to come by - We weren't even able to find the names of 5 of the 36 delegates.

Of the remaining 31, 30 of them have been reported to support Obama, but there aren't good sources for 12 of the 30. We will continue to look for verifiable sources for the rest of these delegates.

But we do have good sources for 18 delegates, and therefore we are moving 18 Uncommitted delegates into the Obama column in our Michigan/Florida sidebar counter, as well as in Scenario 5 in FL & MI By The Numbers.

We fully understand that a deal may be struck at the RBC meeting which makes this analysis all meaningless. But some have proposed that the Obama campaign offer to seat the Michigan delegation "as is", in order to take it off the table as an issue that could be taken to the convention. This analysis gives a baseline of what the Obama campaign is looking as they decide how to play things this week.

. . . more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. A link please. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think that the link is at the top of the post...it can't go in for here..have
to type it in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, I see it in your headline......
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks.
I had meant to post one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. the superdelegates also cancel each other out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. The idea that Clinton could get even one Uncommitted delegate is infuriating.
If anyone wanted Clinton they could have voted for her. The Uncommitted vote was clearly 100% anti-Hillary.



I hope the 59-69 split proposed by MI is accepted.


I can live with a net 10 since it won't make any significant dent in his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought the race was already over?
Havent I read that 7,879,354 times on this board?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Is your subject line a statement or a question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. A sarcastic question that attempts to contrast your informative post
with 90% of the dreck that gets posted here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, sorry. I'm a thickster, as you no doubt know.
Smile and a handshake.

Cheerio,

s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. None of these uncommitted delegates should go to Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC