Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember this:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ballsalicious Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:39 AM
Original message
Remember this:
Edited on Wed May-28-08 01:29 AM by ballsalicious
We lost! in 2000 and 2004! Don't you forget it. Time to wakey-uppy!

:boring:

2000

BUSH BARELY AHEAD OF GORE IN FLORIDA AS RECOUNT HOLDS KEY TO THE ELECTION; Vice President Clings to Slim Edge in Popular Vote Nationwide

By RICHARD L. BERKE

Published: November 9, 2000

For the first time in more than a century, the winner of a presidential election remained unknown a full day after the polls closed, as Gov. George W. Bush of Texas and Vice President Al Gore dispatched teams of lawyers to Florida yesterday to wrangle over the handful of votes upon which their White House dreams now rest.

The fate of the two rivals appeared to ride on the verdict in Florida, where an incomplete vote count had Mr. Bush leading Mr. Gore by 1,784 votes, an extraordinarily narrow margin in a nationwide race in which more than 96 million people voted. His lead in Florida was three one-hundredths of 1 percent of the votes cast.

The Florida secretary of state said she would probably declare a winner by the close of business today after a recount of nearly six million votes and the tallying of absentee ballots. But it was far from certain that the matter would be resolved swiftly.

Even if Florida's 25 electoral votes are delivered to Mr. Bush, Democrats suggested that they would pursue complaints about voting irregularities. Some Democrats in Palm Beach called for a new election in the county, saying the punch-card ballot was so perplexing that people mistakenly voted for Patrick J. Buchanan, the Reform Party candidate, instead of Mr. Gore. In addition, election officials in other states with close outcomes, like Iowa and Wisconsin, said they were bracing for challenges.

With Mr. Gore clinging to the slimmest popular vote margin in modern times, and Mr. Bush grasping for a bare majority of electoral votes to pull him over the top, both candidates were no doubt wondering if, had they done things a bit differently, they might now be mulling over choices for their Cabinet, not mulling over their job prospects.

Still dazed by the events since Tuesday, an official at the Gore headquarters in Nashville proclaimed breathlessly last night, ''We have just reached the twilight zone of American politics.''

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9506E6DE1738F93AA35752C1A9669C8B63&scp=19&sq=gore+bush+wins&st=nyt



2004


Bush wins second term as Kerry concedes - Democrat's team makes decision after looking at Ohio numbers

Wednesday, November 3, 2004 Posted: 1:13 PM EST (1813 GMT)

(CNN) -- President Bush plans to declare victory Wednesday after Sen. John Kerry conceded the election, aides to both men said.

As in the 2000 race, the election came down to a single state.

Ohio's 20 electoral votes proved decisive when it grew clear Wednesday morning that Bush's lead in the state was unlikely to be erased by provisional and absentee ballots. Those votes are still being counted.

A Bush win in Ohio would give the president a projected 274 electoral votes -- 270 are needed to win. ( Electoral College)

Kerry is set to speak about 2 p.m. ET to offer his concession in front of Faneuil Hall in Boston, Massachusetts. Bush plans his acceptance speech for 3 p.m. ET at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington.

Kerry telephoned the White House late Wednesday morning after he and his campaign team looked over voting numbers from Ohio and made the decision to concede.


http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/03/prez.main/index.html



and finally 2008:


This space reserved














:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. .....
:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. What was that horseshit Kerry was spouting in the second article about "healing?"
Intimating that somehow his concession -- his complicity, alas, in election fraud -- would allow "a divided nation to heal."

Instead, the abyss looms closer than ever before.

You cannot give an inch to these fascist fuckheads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ballsalicious Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. i just edited that part out - I am trying to make a point - not make people sick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. What are you trying to say?
I don't know if I should get snarky or not, I hate it when I don't know what to do with my overabundant supply of snark :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ballsalicious Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. remember how close it was? - just a little reality check. Hope we dont fuck it up again...
...that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Means the message wasn't conveyed well enough for you to
figure out how to respond.

I read, and was gonna leave it at that......but saw your call for assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Whew...
I thought GD P had finally turned my brain to mush, a big pile of angry Irish mush :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ballsalicious Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. in the spirit of kindness, took out the 'hey loosers' part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Probably a good call...
wouldn't want anyone to think I'm a "looser", but it would be even worse if they thought I was a loser;)

I know, I'm a spelling nazi, can't help myself, I will seek help immediately :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ballsalicious Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. added little extra verbage and a smiley for assistance... how'd I do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. give to the un snark fund
many around the world do not have the time or ability to snark for themselves
let the UN send your snarks to some poor snarkless child
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. No thank you...
I am old enough to remeber the great snark shortage of '97. If I learned one thing from that troubled time in our nation's past it was to always keep some extra snark on hand in case of emergencies.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. then i must suggest
the "snark saver"green bags at walgreens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC