Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three Super Delegates endorse Obama - magic number now 46

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:50 AM
Original message
Three Super Delegates endorse Obama - magic number now 46
Edited on Wed May-28-08 11:19 AM by grantcart
All from Demconwatch the most authoritative source on Delegate matters
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html

The Obama campaign continues to carefully pull super delegates and reinforce its gorund campaign, with two new Western SDs announcing while Obama is campaigning in the west. The state chair of Co and OR both endorsed Obama today



Colorado Democratic Chair Endorses Obama
DENVER (CBS4/AP) ― Colorado Democratic Party Chair and superdelegate Pat Waak announced her support for Barack Obama Wednesday morning. Her endorsement comes on the same day Obama is in Colorado for a campaign event.

"I have maintained my neutrality throughout Colorado's selection process but feel compelled today to announce my support for several important reasons," Waak said in a prepared statement.

Waak cited Obama's electability and strong support in Colorado.

Obama has 1,979 delegates -- 47 shy of the 2,026 necessary to clinch the nomination. Rival Hillary Rodham Clinton has 1,779 delegates.

Obama plans to tour the Mapleton Expeditionary School of the Arts before the town hall meeting Wednesday morning in Thornton, said Mike Johnston, who runs the school.




http://www.oregonlive.com/commentary/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/editorial/121192890383090.xml&coll=7

Why I've chosen to back Barack Obama
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
F or the first time in 40 years, the Oregon Democratic primary has played a pivotal role in deciding who may be our president. In casting our votes, we Oregonians understood the seriousness of our decision.

As one of the superdelegates to the Democratic convention, I've been especially aware of the importance of my choice. It's a choice that may tip the scales between two extremely well-qualified and able people.

I chose to remain neutral until the Oregon votes were counted. It seemed right not to attempt to influence that vote, to listen to both candidates' messages to Oregon voters and to wait until we knew the pledged delegate count.


I have decided to support Sen. Barack Obama.

Why Obama? Because he received the majority of the votes in the Oregon primary, and he demonstrates the leadership needed to get us out of Iraq, restore our economy, begin the tough job of providing health care for all Americans and, most of all, heal the divisions in our nation. His commitment to grass-roots organizing, similar to Howard Dean's "Fifty State Strategy," will help Democrats win our down-ticket races. His deep understanding of our Constitution ensures that he will appoint judges, to both the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, who will truly defend our constitutional rights and freedoms.



believe that all of us, from whatever party or political affiliation, should come together to elect Sen. Barack Obama as the next president of the United States.

Meredith Wood Smith of Portland is chairwoman of the Democratic Party of Oregon and one of 12 Oregon superdelegates.



Guam SD also endorses


http://thepage.time.com/obama-release-on-guam-superdelegate-endorsement/
Sen. Ben Pangelinan pledges support to Obama
Pacific Daily News • news@guampdn.com • May 28, 2008

Read Comments(3)RecommendPrint this page E-mail this article
Share this article: Del.icio.us Facebook Digg Reddit Newsvine What’s this?
11:40 a.m. - Democratic National Committeeman Sen. Ben Pangelinan announced his support of Sen. Barack Obama as the Demcratic Party nominee to be president of the United States this morning.

“I am honored to cast this most crucial and valuable vote to determine the next President of the United States. It is because of the nature of this vote, that I have taken such deliberate and measured consideration before making my decision,” Pangelinan said in a press release.

Pangelinan’s vote is the last of Guam’s nine delegate votes to be cast. five have chosen Obama, four have chosen Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton

“While both Democratic candidates will be good for America and good for Guam, Senator Obama is my choice. I believe he is the best candidate to deliver on the promise that is America, for all of America,” he said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Need more coffee. Read this as Sugar Delegates. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. 46?
Didn't that SD from the VI cost us one last night...you know the guy who changes his endorsement every two weeks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. noted and corrected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I didn't know you could crawl out from under the bus once you were there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The super delegates can change their minds at the drop of a hat --
Edited on Wed May-28-08 11:01 AM by Benhurst
until they vote at the Convention. Ted Kennedy tried to get them to change up to the last minute in 1980, even though a sitting president, Jimmy Carter, was way ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Wrong
Kennedy was after Pledged Delegates the numbers of supers in 1980 was much less than today.

Harold Ickes created more supers in reaction to the 1980 nomination battle. He also stated in the rules pledged delegates could switch on the first ballot. In 1980 pledged meant pledged per the rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. You're right. I had forgotten. And that makes Kennedy's challenge even worse.
Edited on Wed May-28-08 11:49 AM by Benhurst
In any event, short of some major scandal developing (which is unlikely, since even if there is something out there it takes a real press and a fair amount of time for one to develop), and all this should just be ignored by the Obama camp. He should continue to campaign against McCain and let the process run its course. Trying to short-circuit the process only makes it more difficult for the party to be reunited, and a divided party will go down to defeat in November, stolen election or not.

All the posturing by both sides is getting really tiresome, and is a waste of time. Only the groupies and true believers will be won over to one side or the other, and the public at large will tune out.

If the real issues had been and were being discussed, going down to the line would have been an advantage to the party. The Constitution and Bill of Rights have been shredded, the obscene so-called "Patriot" Act has been renewed, the illegal and immoral occupation of Iraq continues to be funded, and the economy is a time-bomb waiting to go off. But then I guess there are far too many fingerprints on those issues for either party to address. So we are left with the bullshit: campaign strategies, personal attacks, faux outrage and vague, feel-good generalities.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wonder if thats why they rolled out a SD from Guam to counter the VI guy lol
a little island tit for tat lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. My thoughts exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Hmmm, DemConWatch had him there this morning in red
for some reason. Now he's gone and the number stands at 46 - 245 needed O - C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. They noted that they had gotten confirmation directly from Clinton campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Linked page has disappeared from the HRC site
and there's some question. Staying tuned!

ahoff48 said...
I just looked at Clinton's website, under press releases, and I do see releases regarding a Georgia Superdelegate, and a Guam Superdelegate, I don't see anything about Mr. Rodriguez from the Virgin Islands. Something is weird there.

Bioclyde said...
HI,
I also checked out the sites and found nothing about Rodriguez. I am sure that the DCW members will found out the truth. This is going to be a very interesting week in the nomination process.

Claudia in Canada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yup, it's back. and blue nt
Edited on Wed May-28-08 11:38 AM by KSinTX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. But it's likely that 50% of MI and FL will be seated, bumping the number up.
I've heard someone on MSNBC suggest that MI and FL is not just about the delegates from those states, but more about bumping the number 2025 up to buy time. If June 4th rolls around and she is still pushing the "popular vote" meme and has fewer delegates, I might lend credence to that theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It won't buy her time unless she's planning on throwing a hissy fit all summer
If they cut the delegates' votes in half in both states, Obama can still wrap this up in a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. She's going to throw a hissy fit
Regardless of what the number is...and it will be all summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. The strategy of the Obama campaign re the SDs is brilliant...
By dribbling them out in 2s and 3s, the Clinton campaign cannot accuse him of trying to shut out the remaining states/voters from having a "relevant" vote yet, at the same time, the Obama campaign is gently but clearly sending out the message that once the primary is finished, the remaining 3 states have voted, it is OVER.

Were the Obama campaign to reach the needed number of delegates/Super delegates before that time, the Clinton campaign would NO doubt, be out there screaming unfair/illegitimate/bullying, etc. The slow drip, drip, drip takes away any credibility, presuming anyone believed they would have any re this, when, and it is when and not if, the Clinton campaign ratchet up their cries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. It is brilliant
but not only to keep the Clinton campaign from "screaming". It actually helps Democrats who live inside the states that have not yet voted feel involved with the process of selecting our nominee. We've gone this far, might as well let folks in those last few contests feel like they are not second class Democrats during the first nomination contest in decades where it didn't all seem to be settled after a relative handful of early states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes, it is a "velvet glove" approach
I like your statement:

We've gone this far, might as well let folks in those last few contests feel like they are not second class Democrats during the first nomination contest in decades where it didn't all seem to be settled after a relative handful of early states.

Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Another SD makes it 45


http://www.blueoregon.com/2008/05/another-superde.html
Another Superdelegate for Obama: Wayne Kinney


Wayne Kinney, a DNC committeeperson from Bend, has announced his support for Barack Obama. He joins Meredith Wood Smith, who announced earlier today, and four other superdelegates backing Obama. Oregon has 12 in all. Two have announced support for Hillary Clinton. Kinney wrote in a statement:

For the first time in 40 years, Oregon Democrats had a presidential primary that mattered. Presidential campaigns had offices in places that had never seen them before. It seemed as though you couldn’t turn around without seeing a candidate, or at least a member of the family. Turnout was the highest it’s ever been.

It’s going to be a really good year for Democrats. Oregon Democrats will be right in the thick of it. We have Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton to thank for that. They have run hard in the longest, toughest presidential contest Democrats have ever seen. There is no other Democratic presidential primary contest that even compares with this one.

Senator Obama wasn’t supposed to be able to get this far. One member of Congress from Illinois said that for Sen. Obama to win the nomination, he’d have to be perfect. He’s been pretty damned good. The fact that this nomination is still inches from being decided is a testament to the abilities of both Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Relatively speaking from my view..
he is perfect..interesting quote.

"Senator Obama wasn’t supposed to be able to get this far. One member of Congress from Illinois said that for Sen. Obama to win the nomination, he’d have to be perfect. He’s been pretty damned good. The fact that this nomination is still inches from being decided is a testament to the abilities of both Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. I needed a majic number fix
Thanks grantcart!

Keep 'em coming!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. future teaser June 1st Maine add on will be an Obama supporter
John Knutson, chairman of the Maine Democratic Party, said Sunday that his add-on to the superdelegate lineup will be a Barack Obama supporter.

He said he is doing this to make sure Maine’s delegate count reflects the popular vote in the state, where Obama got 60 percent of the vote.

At current count, this would give Obama three of Maine’s eight superdelegates. There is one superdelegate for Hillary Clinton, and four are uncommitted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
23. Thank you, Meredith Wood Smith of Portland, Ore
"I have decided to support Sen. Barack Obama."

Why Obama? Because he received the majority of the votes in the Oregon primary, and he demonstrates the leadership needed to get us out of Iraq, restore our economy, begin the tough job of providing health care for all Americans and, most of all, heal the divisions in our nation. His commitment to grass-roots organizing, similar to Howard Dean's "Fifty State Strategy," will help Democrats win our down-ticket races. His deep understanding of our Constitution ensures that he will appoint judges, to both the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, who will truly defend our constitutional rights and freedoms.


And, Pat Waak of Colorado and Ben Pangelinan of Guam:) Thanks Grant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. KICKED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. Punt
It's first down and 10 on the one yard line ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC