|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 10:59 AM Original message |
So "disenfranchising" Obama supporters in MI is OK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MidwestTransplant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
1. Obama had 0 supporters since he got no votes. Hillary should get all hers though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. That worked quite well for Putin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. I know at least 2 Michiganders who would have voted for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. I don't get this disenfranchisement BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
3. Humpty Dumpty fell in January. You're too late to enjoy the omelet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. HUH? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
32. Too many folks just don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. LOLOLOL!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
5. However many supporters he had, they were only unable to vote for him because he removed his name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Since the entire primary was invalid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Do you have any idea how hyporcritical your entire post is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
34. I think if we tell the people of MI and FL that their votes are worthless, we kiss the GE goodbye. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Insisting on counting votes that were not cast according to election rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. damn it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. The pledge did not involve removing names from the ballot. It just didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
6. Lanny Davis had a brilliant solution to the MI vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
36. Lanny just didn't go far enough. He needs to follow these suggestions from John Cole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RooferDem (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
10. I find this thread to be unbelievable sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Point out the sexist comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RooferDem (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. S3X1ST! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Ouch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
12. Sorry, "uncommitted" is not a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. And neither is Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Yes ... and the FUBAR in January was not an "election." (You state just one of the reasons.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
13. Obama removed his name. Why did he do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_Bonanza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Why did Ted Kennedy remove his name in 1980? Why did Gore and Bradley also do it in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. It's called "good faith". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Because he doesn't believe he's above the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Because he's a member of the Democratic party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Because he's not a chickenshit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
20. "Uncommitted" vote for the candidate they want at the convention.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Obama supporters were also told to vote for Romney in the GOP primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
21. when delegates were chosen for MI, Obama got the uncommitted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
26. Obama took his name off the ballot, obviously he didn't want any votes from MI. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Obviously you fail at coming up with a reasonable argument. -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sulawesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
30. You know, as I read this post, it is really unbelievable to me that anyone tries to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-28-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. QFT friend. -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC