Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just had a GREAT idea on how to settle this: Push BOTH Hillary and Obama to pick a V.P. NOW!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:03 PM
Original message
I just had a GREAT idea on how to settle this: Push BOTH Hillary and Obama to pick a V.P. NOW!
Let's get the V.P. Choice out there and done NOW, BEFORE the Democratic Convention! Everything else this year has been changed and sped up, why not this?

That way, if Obama or Hillary pick someone Great, then all the better, we can start comparing and contrasting their picks, but if one of them makes a really BAD choice, we can see that now and don't get stuck with another Lieberman type choice when it's too late, at the convention.

Now, please don't get me wrong, my objection to Lieberman is not an "anti-Jewish thing," my family is VERY religiously mixed and I come from a VERY long line of Rabbis, it just that Lieberman was a TERRIBLE V.P. choice and, I think, sank Al Gore in 2000.

But back to the issue above, I find my biggest fear about Obama is that I think he has a VERY "weak bench" (very few good choices for V.P. and his cabinet) and a terrible V.P. pick, by Obama, I think is probably my biggest fear and the fear of most of us "old people" (I'm 44) who have been around a while and seen this sort of hype before, so let's get it done NOW! What's you got?

Now I don't know who Hillary's might pick will be either if things go her way in the next month or so (and it still could), so I think a great V.P. pick from Obama would get me to switch to him, but a really bad one, or a great pick by Hillary would solidify my support behind her.

Now I know, the Obama "supporters" are going to hate this idea, so try to ignore the really hateful comments this post is going to get, I know I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why would Sen Clinton pick a VP?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Because it's NOT over, Obama just won't admit it.
What are ya, Chicken?:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. News flash: it's over. She lost. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. News Flash! No it's not Over.
Get a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Are you one of the folks hoping for a "long shot" miracle? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. No, seriously, its over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. It's fucking over...you just like to play fucking
boring games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. True. Clinton will not be the nominee (or the President, or the Vice President). But she sure is
giving it a good try, I'll give 'er that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is settled, Hillary just won't admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why should Hillary choose a VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Because if she picked Wes Clark I would write them in on the ticket.
THAt'S A WINNING TICKET! And this is a good idea. I had thought the same thing many times. If Hillary had announced that Wes Clark would be her running mate...she'd be in first place now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Me too! This would make a lot of Clark supporters (like me) very happy.
Thanks for your positive feed-back, it very rare around here (at DU) these days.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. And if they both pick the same one..
...steel cage match over the candidate!

"Two go in! One comes out! Two go in! One comes out!"

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That won't happen, I'm sure one will make a better pick than the other...
...and then we don't get stuck with the dud, hold your nose and vote pick in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary would probably have picked Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. This Obama supporter doesn't hate the idea. Here's the ticket....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. O.K., maybe but that pick...
Edited on Wed May-28-08 02:43 PM by Up2Late
...it's O.K., but not great.

Have you floated this ticket in your circles? And if so, what was the reaction?

See, this could be a problem, because just about anyone he picks is going to be a sort of a let down, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Your "idea" sounds pre-loaded for you to favor *any* Hillary choice
If "just about anyone" that Obama picks is going to be a letdown...

But really...it's in the superdelegates' hands to put the nominee over the top. Are you seriously thinking that the rest of superdelegates would be swayed to Hillary - even though she's steadily blown a 100+ superdelegate lead thanks to her negative campaigning - if she suddenly made a great VP pick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. If they were to both pick..
I would like to see Clinton take Clark and see Obama take either Bloomberg or Powell.

Clark would help Clinton counter McCain's argument that he has more knowlege about Iraq.

Bloomberg would help Obama on the economy, and Powell would help Obama on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Good idea Clinton/Clark, I even like way it sounds...
...that would give me even more confidence in her. Your other picks, not so much, both of those picks wouldn't sway me his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Who would sway you to Obama?
Other than a Hillary VP that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Good question, nobody that I can think of right now...
...if I do actually vote in the November "election" here in the Diebold State of Georgia (which isn't likely) I'm going to be holding my nose if the choice is Obama.

I say I might not vote in November be cause EVERY ELECTION since Diebold took over the vote counting here in 2002 has been RIGGED. Yes EVERY ELECTION. The only candidates who have won since then have won because the GOP and Diebold wanted them to win.

They have been very crafty, letting just enough Democrats win in very Democratic areas so as not to raise questions in the complicit MSM. I've come to the conclusion that going in and voting on these machines just makes things worse, adding to the delusion of real Elections here. Get Obama to start talking about how he's going to trash our Diebold machines and fund new ones with a paper trail and I'll consider voting for him, but so far, he's said nothing. Not surprising really, as our fraudulent 2008 primary went to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't see how this would settle anything
The gist of your post is that if Hillary and Obama each pick a VP candidate now, it would somehow have an effect on the nomination. However, the nomination battle is already over - sure, it's not official yet, just like McCain is not officially the Republican nominee until their convention.

So I don't "hate this idea", but I see your reasoning as flawed. It's like saying that a football game that has 2 minutes left, with one team ahead by 28 points, should have a mascot or cheerleading contest to decide which team should win the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. Great analogy!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Since Obama has pretty much gutted the party, I think he should run without a VP candidate.
It would be symbolic. Plus one less political career would be damaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Please don't encourage her, it will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yes, it will.
For you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. Wouldn't it look really arrogant to pick a VP now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yes it does, so since Obama is already doing this in secret meetings, I say let's bring it out ...
...into the light of day, so that everyone can see what the choices are and what we might face in November.

This picking a V.P. behind closed doors crap has screwed us Democrats over in too many Elections in the last 50 years, if we ever needed "Change" on any ONE thing, this is it and is my wish for "Change," and if Obama REALLY is for change, CHANGE this process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Bring what "out", exactly?
Are you suggesting that Obama hold interviews with potential VP prospects in public? Your logic is lacking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. There's nothing to settle: Obama won, Hillary lost. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wow, look at the silence on this thread
Not one response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It's deafening
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
32. What I was going to suggest is that each of them debate McCain
and then we can see who can beat him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. Both of them would beat McCain. . .
so that wouldn't settle anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. Hillary is done, fini caputo... June 3rd. that's it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
35. Couple of problems with that . . .
1. one of the biggest one being the elections are OVER in less than a week. Only 2 states haven't yet voted. So how do you pick the "winner" of the vice-presidential sweepstakes?

2. It's against the RULES. They have set down rules to decide who is going to be the nominee from among the candidates running. You don't change the RULES in the middle of the election (I know Clinton and many of her supporters have a hard time with this point).

3. (I know, I said a couple) If you're going to pick say, Clark(Clinton) or Richardson (Obama) why aren't Clark and Richardson the nominees?(Because either they didn't run, or they ran and didn't get enough votes in the first place).

4. Because, barring some catastrophe, Obama is already the nominee. The race is already as good as over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. Hillary wouldn't get my vote if God himself was her running mate and he threatened me .......
eternal damnation. The only way she can win this primary is to steal it by using a guessing game of numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. Maybe they should both pick out curtains for the oval office. Oh wait, Hillary did that in December
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC