As a former Kucinich supporter, I came reluctantly to the Obama camp.
But then the M$M raised the issue of a daishiki-clad minister saying the GD words about America. So I expected Sen Obama to politely back away from this minister, but instead he presented us with a very reasoned speech about the issues that had faced older people of color.
Like Jon Stewart said 36 hours later: On a Tuesday at 11 o'clock in the morning, A politician addressed the American people, on the issue of race, as though we were adults.
I fell for Obama, hook, line and sinker.
Then yesterday, John Q Citizen posted his personal experience with the O. campaign team leaders that he found roaming around out in Montana.
You can find his discussion here:
http://tinyurl.com/5svzqoNow another favorite writer weighs in with his take on this -- Norman Solomon offers up this:
Let's Party Like It's 1932: The Obama Option By Norman Solomon Seventy-six years ago, to many ears on the left, Franklin D. Roosevelt sounded way too much like a centrist. True, he was eloquent, and he'd generated enthusiasm in a Democratic base eager to evict Republicans from the White House. But his campaign was moderate -- with policy proposals that didn't indicate he would try to take the country in bold new directions if he won the presidency.
Yet FDR's triumph in 1932 opened the door for progressives. After several years of hitting the Hoover administration's immovable walls, the organizing capacities of labor and other downtrodden constituencies could have major impacts on policy decisions in Washington.
Today, segments of the corporate media have teamed up with the Clinton campaign to attack Barack Obama. Many of the rhetorical weapons used against him in recent weeks -- from invocations of religious faith and guns to flag-pin lapels -- may as well have been ripped from a Karl Rove playbook. The key subtexts have included racial stereotyping and hostility to a populist upsurge.
Do we have a major stake in this fight? Does it really matter whether Hillary Clinton or Obama wins the Democratic nomination? Is it very important to prevent John McCain from moving into the White House? The answers that make sense to me are yes, yes and yes.
¥ ¥ ¥
In 1932, there were scant signs that Franklin Delano Roosevelt might become a progressive president. By the summer of that election year, when he accepted the Democratic Party's nomination for president, his "only left-wing statements had been exceedingly vague," according to FDR biographer Frank Freidel.
Full Story is at
http://www.coastalpost.com/08/05/24.html