Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Pres. Obama go a little too far by publically supporting Specter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SamCooke Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:48 PM
Original message
Did Pres. Obama go a little too far by publically supporting Specter
Edited on Mon May-04-09 04:50 PM by SamCooke
The guy is against Public Health Care, against the EFC act, and other things we as liberals care about. What is the guys purpose in the party? Please someone tell me. After seeing Specter over the weekend, I just don't see why President Obama would support this man. And why would Biden and others want him in the party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes, and if that rat faced little fucker
doesn't toe the line on healthcare and EFCA, Obama should NOT campaign for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Hey, what'd the rats ever do to you, you gottta insult 'em like that? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. IMO yes
"welcome to the party--we'll see what happens in PA in 2010" should have been his comment.

But by saying what he did, it indicates a deal has been made. Sestak is keeping the election an open book--why didn't Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm sure that deal will be nullified if Specter doesn't play ball
So far he's been a giant disappointment and is still 100% Repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. yeah--they'll kick him out with the trash like Lieberman
NOT!

I'd love to see it.

But Arlen "Magic Bullet" Specter seems to know where the bodies are buried, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:56 PM
Original message
We'll see won't
we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. YES
and so did a lot of people here on DU.

Specter, is, and will always be, a scumbag.

Vote for the Democrat. Don't vote for Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. No. He said he would support him in a GE. Never said that about a primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Really? If true, that's an easy out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SamCooke Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. now thats a good one. I hope he says that come the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Maybe he said IF Specter survives the primary, he'd support him in the GE
Specter COULD be knocked off in the primary and Obama wouldn't need to fulfil his promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yes. All he said was he was confident he could win reelection.
But he has to win a primary first.

Again just like with things said on the campaign trail and Obama's torture statement. You have to actually listen to what he says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did Obama say specifically that he would campaign for Specter?
No one seems to know for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Or did Specter pull a big con job?
He probably made vague references to "loyalty" and "supporting the President's policies", but never made a specific promise to FULLY support Obama's goals.

If Specter keeps this up, Obama should WITHDRAW his primary support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. No. He never promised support in a primary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Of course he didn't. Presidents don't pick sides in primaries. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. It is very disturbing, but apparently Obama has already pledged to help Specter.
I don't see how the Dems are getting anything out of this situation. This is maddening. Specter comes out looking like the winner because he doesn't have to compromise on much of anything. The Dems are already in discussion about how to give Specter seniority over other Dems with regard to committee appointments. Now, what in the Sam Hell are the Dems getting in return for all their goodwill? Why are Democrats always expected to compromise their principles and negotiate with Repukes????!?!??!

This is just PURE, UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT!!! :puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Specter's the DEVIL!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dean, Carville Warn Specter: Shape Up Or Face Primary
I hope they get GANGSTA and STAY GANGSTA!!!!

<snip>

Dean, Carville Warn Specter: Shape Up Or Face Primary

Less than a week into his tenure as a Democrat and Sen. Arlen Specter is already stepping sharply on the toes of party elders. Key Democratic figures warned on Monday that their newly minted colleague, despite having the backing of the White House, could face a tough primary challenge should he continue to oppose key tenets of the party's agenda.

"I'm pleased that he saw the light and decided he would be a better fit for the Democratic Party and I think you have to allow for his political views to evolve," said former DNC chairman Howard Dean in an interview with the Huffington Post. "But he won't win the Democratic primary by taking the position that you should not have or a public option for health insurance... If he takes these kinds of views, of course there is going to be a Democratic primary."


As it stands now, Specter's chance to be the Democratic nominee in that race seems relatively solid. The White House has committed itself to campaigning with and raising funds for the Senate veteran. And his poll numbers against Pat Toomey -- the only Republican candidate to official in the race -- are rock solid.

That said, in his interview with the Huffington Post, Howard Dean scoffed at the notion that other Democrats in Pennsylvania will cede the race to Specter if they believe he is vulnerable.

"You don't clear the field in a place like Pennsylvania," said the former Vermont Governor. "You only clear the field by merit. Pennsylvania is too big to have some of these people put your arm round you and say it is not the right time.... and labor is a powerful force in that state."

</snip>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/04/dean-carville-warn-specte_n_196033.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. No, and here's why....
do you HONESTLY think Obama is that stupid?

Do you think for one minute the guy who came almost out of nowhere to beat the Clintons when they had every advantage, the guy who turned EVERY Republican attack back on them, is so abysmally stupid as to NOT have gotten a healthy price from Specter in return for his support?

I seem to recall voices here during the primaries all crying doom on Obama because he wasn't doing what THEY would do - and ALL of them were wrong.

He's earned my trust that he knows what he's doing.

He can still lose it, but for the time being I give him the benefit of the doubt on political maneuvering. Based on his track record to date, I'm not willing yet to bet against Obama knowing EXACTLY what he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. I agree with you on this. I can't believe that Obama would take a flying leap
with Specter w/o knowing exactly what his game plan would be. It's just silly to believe that Obama would leave himself open to having egg on his face.

Like you said, this could possibly not work out exactly as planned. But I still have confidence in Obama's political smarts and his integrity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Depends on what Obama's game is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. No because at this rate Spector will never make it to the GE.
It's up to Specter to tow the line and pretend to be a loyal Democrat or see his ass tossed out in 2010. I think he's a rat and I really don't know why he switched parties. Based on his comments and actions he will never win a Democratic primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hey! You gotta read this (TODAY'S Philly Inquirer)
Specter Is Vulnerable in Democratic Primary
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20090504_Specter_is_vulnerable_in_Democratic_primary.html

And by the way, Obama made it clear he'll support Specter all the way:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/us/politics/30specter.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes
The proper response should have been stay GOP, vote Democratic, and retire at the end of your term. Fini.

Obama makes mistakes but I am glad he is POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. absolutely! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. I think there's a gamble going on.
I'm guessing that Obama and Biden and so on are going to give Specter time to let his views "evolve"... in other words let him take some time about it so he doesn't look like a completely unprincipled hack. And, if you think about it, until a vote comes up, whatever he says about being a loyal democrat or not loyal, or whatever... is just political theater.
That said... if he has the cajones to vote against healthcare or EFCA, I suggest y'all in Pennsylvania crucify his ass in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Specter knows that being crucified in the primary is exactly what he'll get
if he doesn't play ball with Obama. That's the sword hanging over him. If he wants to hold on to his seat he will have to make compromises. Still, nothing is certain as both he and Obama most certainly know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
29. Because I'm oh-so much better informed than Obama, I can certainly say yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. It's a win-win for the Democrats
This speaks loudly for the failure of the Republican Party as it moves further and further from the position held by the majority of Americans. Their support is to be found among the extremists of the fundamentalist and racist persuasions.

Polls have revealed that on every issue they are on the wrong side, especially in regard to the younger voters. If Specter doesn't support the Democratic Party's position, he will be history and he will be replaced in the general election.

For the time being he is the consummate "useful idiot" that has given the Republican's a black eye. He has shown that they is no place for moderate Republicans in their Party. Hopefully the Republican Party, which has degenerated into a pack of raving extremists, will become a minor party without any power to spread their message of hatred and division.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC