Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Didn't Republicans used to be AGAINST secession?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:04 PM
Original message
Didn't Republicans used to be AGAINST secession?
I could've sworn they elected some tall bearded guy to keep it from happening once.

Gee, what was I thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. WHAT!
Do you really think todays Pukes would support Lincoln?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, they'd have trouble...especially since he came out.
Edited on Wed May-06-09 07:18 PM by Ken Burch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. No, but they sure love to brag about being the "party of Lincoln".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. they were all for states' rights
up until Gore vrs. Bush, in which case the wind blew the opposite direction and the Repugs decided that the State of Florida and its Supreme Court doesn't matter as far as the right to decide which votes will be counted in a federal election. So now the US Supreme Court has the final say when an election is to be decided, and states' rights are largely irrelevant. Twisted logic it seems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hank Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. That was before Republicans turned conservative and Democrats turned liberal
Edited on Wed May-06-09 07:23 PM by Old Hank
During the civil war era, the Republican Party was the progressive party and the Democratic Party was the conservative party. Some time during the 20th century the coin flipped and the opposite became true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. They were against it before they were for it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Dang, you just beat me to it. Feh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ha! I was wondering why anyone hadn't posted it first. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. They were against secession before they were for it. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wow, Bizarro John Kerry and Seinfeld in the SAME post....brilliant!
Edited on Wed May-06-09 07:35 PM by Ken Burch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sometimes it's like that scene at 12 Oakes....
... where all of Scarlett's neighbors stand up to declare how they will destroy the Union army in two weeks tops and Rhett Butler points out that they have no weapons and nothing needed to WIN a war then shakes his head and walks out of the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lincoln? You mean that 'radical' liberal who didn't respect property rights?!?
It's the ultimate irony that the Republican party was founded as a regional proNorth, and especially Pro-New England party, considering how the GOP couldn't be deader in the New England states today, and has embraced the south today as everything they stand for. When the GOP was founded they were everything the south wasn't, and everything the south loathed.

It's even more ironic that a lot of the south's arguments and issues they were for back then have been adopted by the republican party today (though some have been slightly modified to be up with the times), I mean look at the similarities of the GOP's agenda to the south's agenda before the civil war.

-Both are strongly pro-property rights (then the South wanted their right to own slaves protected, now the south wants their rights to own guns protected)
-Both are strongly anti-tax (a lot of the taxes back then were tariffs that protected northern manufacturers from foreign competition but were loathed by the south)
-Both are strongly anti-government spending (more government spending on stuff like building roads met more taxes to pay for it)
-Both are the pro-discrimination parties

Lincoln ironically was a moderate liberal in his time, and after the civil war ended the radical republicans (who were radical liberals for their time) basically ran the show from congress for a while as Andrew Johnson powerlessly watched almost all his vetoes get overridden by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. The "Party of Lincoln" was extinguished by Booth's bullet. They
oozed into the carpetbaggers. Their only other moment of greatness was Teddy Roosevelt--the liberal, imperialist, conservationist trustbuster who accidentally became president partially as consequence of a plot to banish him from New York politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Teddy was great-well, if you weren't Cuban or Pinoy(Filipino)
He had a big mustache and bigger contradictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No argument here. He was a progressive Victorian imperialist. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Today's GOP is closer to Ted Kaczynski than Abe Lincoln.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. That was before the Confederate coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. They're only against it when they're in control
when they're on the losing end of things then they're afore it. :yoiks: If they don't like the way things are here then they can do what they would tell us to do ... LEAVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yes, and Democrats supported Jim Crow and Slavery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC