Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Jim MCDERMOTT at Sebelius' Q&A?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:39 PM
Original message
Rep. Jim MCDERMOTT at Sebelius' Q&A?!
Edited on Wed May-06-09 11:09 PM by vaberella
I loved him at Sebe's Q&A..he was using O's plan to provide almost free medical education (ala Cuba) in and new coming medical students would have to spend 4 years residency in areas that are in direct need of medical care. It would fully balance out O's not only community initiative plan but it would compliment the public option. New med students, providing low cost but quality health education and hands on practical experience in order to get fully qualified and functional medical working force sent out across the nations. It will be like Teach America almost but with doctors.

I'm surprised no one mentioned it...it was one of the most brilliant plans proposed at Sebelius' Q&A with the Health Reform committee.

For the hearing-impaired posters...because I realize this was a problem at a video post...


Jim MCDERMOTT: But I want to talk about Healthcare at the moment. Whichitaw (?), Kansas has 90 specialists for 100,000 people where as Boston has 180 specialists per 100,000 people. Everyone who has looked at those situations knows that, that doesn't mean they have better health care in Boston than they have in Wichitaw (?). What it reflects is the lack of primary care physicians in the Boston area, which they found out when they started asking. They couldn't provide mass primary care physicians for everybody who was asking for one. I made a proposal that we have ALL PUBLIC MEDICAL SCHOOLS BE FREE with the requirement that the students when they come out would serve four years in primary care in the State and one of the things that the Dartmouth Study (which I'm not sure is) shown--the Dartmouth University study--is that there is clearly, um, no connection between how many specialists you have and the quality of health care or anything except where people want to live in terms of where they practice. Now if you train them in Kansas and they move to San Francisco. You, the people of Kansas, have got nothing (reminds me of brain drain the US, Canada and Western European countries did and are doing to developing nations-Vabby)Washington State is part of Wammy (?)---Washington, Alaska, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming---we train all the doctors in one medical school. But they don't necessarily go back to the rural areas. With that kind of provision, I hope that what comes out of the provision when the President puts out his additional, uh, provisions is a mission that looks at workforce comission, a permanent comission for workforce planning. The..Right now, we have a graduate medical commission but that only deals with specialists. It does not deal with a broader issue of how you get enough private practitioners to get into the whole area primary care and I would like to hear your ideas having been a Governor and delivered a state having operated way below the national average. Actually, one half below the national average, there's only two other cities that have below the average of Wichitaw, and that's Sue City, Iowa and Mason (?), Arizona. So I'd like to hear how you did it.

I thought his proposal was brilliant.

Edited: for numbers correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. 180,000 per 100,000??!!!
Are you sure the numbers are correct? You sure it's not 180 per 100,000? No way that the general public is more than 60% specialist physicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you're right..he had made an error in the first number and I ran with it without correction. Thanks.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC