|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 08:21 AM Original message |
New jobless claims unexpectedly plunge to 601K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. Consider this headline with Sludge's, which links to the same report - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Drudge's headline is better... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. while the number is a record, we are no where near the top in terms of % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Actually, historically speaking the direction of new claims is far more important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. And The Stimulus Projects Are JUST Getting Started |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 10:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. It's not better. Here's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Drudge's headline is deceptive. The number of individuals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. The GOP is so screwed. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. "I don't think 'plunge' means what you think it means." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
7. What happened to simply stating "unemployment dropped"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:08 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Aggregate unemployment will continue to increase for some time at this rate, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. It's reserved for when that actually happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
9. "plunge" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
11. Wow! Let the good times roll! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. It's still a positive sign. The acceleration is on our side, if the speed isn't yet. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
15. That's good news. Surprised the markets don't like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Market's don't rise on employement, they rise on layoffs. Because: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-07-09 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
16. How can this or how Drudge said it, actually indicate anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC