Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New jobless claims unexpectedly plunge to 601K

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:21 AM
Original message
New jobless claims unexpectedly plunge to 601K
New jobless claims unexpectedly plunge to 601K

New jobless claims unexpectedly plunge to 601,000; lowest level since January
Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
On Thursday May 7, 2009, 9:07 am EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- New applications for jobless benefits plunged to the lowest level in 14 weeks, a possible sign that the massive wave of layoffs has peaked. Still, the number of unemployed workers getting benefits climbed to a new record.

The Labor Department reported Thursday that the number newly laid off workers applying for benefits dropped to 601,000 last week. That was far better than the rise to 635,000 claims that economists expected.

But the total number of people receiving jobless benefits climbed to 6.35 million, a 14th straight record.

The four-week moving average of initial jobless claims, which smooths out volatility, totaled 623,500 last week, a decrease of more than 30,000 from the high in early April. Goldman Sachs economists have said a decline of 30,000 to 40,000 in the four-week average is needed to signal a peak.

<SNIP>

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-jobless-claims-apf-15164532.html/print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Consider this headline with Sludge's, which links to the same report -
"NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED GETTING BENEFITS CLIMBS TO RECORD"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Drudge's headline is better...
I'm really tired of the MSM twisting every bad bit of news into a rainbow wrapped in silver linings.

It's important to note that jobless claims did fall from their monthly peak. It's also important to
note that the number of unemployed getting benefits is a record (as Drudge said).

What's odd, is how the MSM positions every bit of bad news in a wonderful light, "Oh, we're so lucky...this
is not as bad as expected!"

Just stop editorializing and trying to hide reality--and report the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. while the number is a record, we are no where near the top in terms of %
it is a record for the number getting benefits because the population is bigger but that is a deceptive number.

Whether it is the MSM or something else, good news raises all ships. I don't want false hope or optimism but excessive doom and gloom (as Drudge would want it to be) could be far worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Actually, historically speaking the direction of new claims is far more important.
Continuing claims are universally a lagging indicator. It doesn't mean people aren't hurting, but it tells you nothing about where we are going.

Initial claims are still high, but if the most recent direction continues and we get down to the mid-500,000s per week in the next month, that correlates very strongly with the beginnings of economic recovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. And The Stimulus Projects Are JUST Getting Started
All those jobs have not even begun to hit yet.

I really think we've seen the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. It's not better. Here's why
Edited on Thu May-07-09 10:07 AM by DrToast
The number of new people filing for unemployment is a leading indicator. It tells you where the economy is going.

The number of people collecting unemployment benefits is lagging. It tells you nothing about the direction of the economy.

Edit: Doh! Zynx said the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Drudge's headline is deceptive. The number of individuals
receiving benefits is a records but the percentage of workers in the economy receiving benefits is nowhere near previous records. Drudge is the one editorializing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. The GOP is so screwed. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. "I don't think 'plunge' means what you think it means."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. What happened to simply stating "unemployment dropped"?
They probably also unexpectedly saw the increase in commuter traffic as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Aggregate unemployment will continue to increase for some time at this rate, however
what this means is that unemployment is growing at a slower rate than it had been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. It's reserved for when that actually happens.
Unemployment didn't drop, it just increased by less than expected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. "plunge" ?
LOL

:rofl:

the propaganda is becoming more desperate and more laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wow! Let the good times roll!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. It's still a positive sign. The acceleration is on our side, if the speed isn't yet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. That's good news. Surprised the markets don't like it
Usually when economic news is better than expected the markets jump. But the DOW is down about 80 points right now. I wonder why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Market's don't rise on employement, they rise on layoffs. Because:
Edited on Thu May-07-09 01:14 PM by Political Heretic
It's a sign that companies are reducing costs and thus can make more profits. Employment is an expense that effects bottom line. :)

I shit you not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. How can this or how Drudge said it, actually indicate anything
anywhere near truthful??

The fact is, the unemployment numbers are always false, no matter if you prefer to see the glass half empty or half full..because those who fell off the rolls, due to entirely exhausting their benefits, are not even counted, yet they are still every bit as unemployed...

Everyone needs to read that article and digest what it does say...how about 6.35 million people receiving benefits...6.35 MILLION PEOPLE....that the laid off are NOT finding new jobs...that there's a loss in productivity, maybe not as high as they expected(and doesn't a loss in productivity mean loss of jobs?)...but still high enough for concern....and the difference in unemployment now vs one year ago, is about DOUBLE...and that any spending, done in April, was done because people received their income tax refunds....(a one time a year thing).....

So tell me, what happens when the 6.35 million run out of benefits...??? Do we think there will be a miracle and there will be jobs out there to re-employ them???(I figure that's the real problem) and then how about the new ones facing unemployment right now...like the 21,000+ at Chrysler, or the 2,000 here, or the 300 there??...that aren't even on the rolls yet...IMO...recovery of any sort, IF it happens, IS gonna be in the distant future for sure...but I hope to hell I am wrong...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC