Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sotomayor: Very modest assets - will have no financial vetting problems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:04 AM
Original message
Sotomayor: Very modest assets - will have no financial vetting problems

Sotomayor Rose High, with Few Assets



http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/05/07/sotomayor_rose_high_with_few_a.html?wprss=44

Congressional staffers tend to begin the vetting process for Supreme Court nominees by looking for fatal flaws in their personal finances -- anything from shady business partners to holdings in corporations that might have business before the court. Experience has proven that financial holdings can prove fertile ground for digging.

Not so in the case of Sonia Sotomayor of New York, who is considered a front-runner to replace the retiring David H. Souter.

Although Sotomayor earns $179,500 a year as a judge on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York and worked for eight years as a private attorney in New York before joining the bench, in recent years she has reported having virtually no assets.

For 2007, Sotomayor, who is divorced, reported that she had no financial holdings that needed to be reported on her personal financial disclosure report, save for a checking account and a saving account with Citibank. Combined, the accounts were worth $50,000 to $115,000. That was more than she reported as assets during the previous four years, during which the value of the accounts at some points was listed as low as $30,000.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Citibank? Not a very good judge of character to be involved with them.
Yeah, it's a little picky. I sure hope the person who gets this job is more like Ralph Nader (anti-corporation) than Alan Greenspan--the biggest fool in the history of America for his support of bankster derivatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are you kidding me?
You are casting judgment on someones character based on whatever bank is convenient to their home/office? I thought I had heard it all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The fact that she has net assets around $ 30,000 puts her in a closer demographic
to Nader than anyone on the bench. Her choice of Citibank could simply be, like most of us, a decision which bank's local drive through ATM is the most convenient, require the fewest miles to be driven and therefore the 'greenest' bank to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes, I'm sure this judge is 100% guilty and involved in creating derivatives at Citi. NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thats riduclous. Just because she has bank accounts with one of the largest
banks in the world, its a bad judge of character? Thats a ridiculous statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. you mean where she started her checking account years ago is a political decision?
:wtf:

you fail. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Holy shit she has a bank account
Edited on Thu May-07-09 12:49 PM by Occam Bandage
clearly that means she is a corporatist responsible for the derivatives market.

The fuck you smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. ROFL @ "the fuck you smoking?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hank Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I have two Citibank credit cards
I guess that makes me co-responsible for the recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. rofl
holy fucking god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Your holy water needs a filter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Um, yeah. I bet Nader keeps his inherited millions in his mattress, just to screw with those
nasty corporate banks!?!?!!? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. What about the video that seems to imply - according to RW standards -
she's an "activist" judge? That'll send them into a tizzy bound to keep the nomination tied up for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. And in NYC, that's not much, especially
for someone with her professional experience and education.

From what I've heard of her, and seen (a little), I rather like her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. actually for a judge that's not much anywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. True enough!
The COLA in that area though, is something ridiculous!

But yes, not much for a judge. I don't think they'll be able to call her an elitist in a financial sense. And in an education and intelligence sense, I sure hope she IS an elitist! I want someone really smart and really trained!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. We cannot risk it with a moderate like Sotomayor - too much is at stake.
We need a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. She is a liberal.
Or is this the game where we decide that the definition of "liberal" is "to the left of whoever Obama picks?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. What? She is a liberal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. GOPers are ready to hit her on a quote about the appeals court being where policy is made
She supposedly said it several years ago or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. I heard she has a relative who once shopped at Wal-Mart. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC