Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehner (Dick - Party of "NO") on unemployment #s - calls for bipartisanship, end of "arrogance"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:43 AM
Original message
Boehner (Dick - Party of "NO") on unemployment #s - calls for bipartisanship, end of "arrogance"
Boehner responds to Friday's unemployment numbers
Posted: 09:01 AM ET

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The quickest reaction to this morning's unemployment report apparently goes to House Minority Leader John Boehner.

His office sent out a statement of Boehner's reaction to the April jobs report just six minutes after the Labor Department announced the news, which shows that the nation's unemployment level jumped to 8.9 percent.

"About two and a half million jobs have been lost since the beginning of the year, yet some here in Washington continue to believe that we can borrow and spend our way back to prosperity. Rather than working across the aisle on plans to create more jobs, rebuild Americans' savings, and reinvigorate the housing market, the spending, taxing, and borrowing binge that the Administration and Congress have set out on in the first four months of this year isn't helping our economy."

Washington's arrogance must be replaced by a new spirit of bipartisan cooperation to improve job prospects for millions of Americans. Republicans have taken every opportunity to reach out to the President and find areas of agreement. We offered a stimulus bill that created twice the jobs at half the price as the Democrats' bill. Our budget alternative curbed spending, created jobs by cutting taxes, and controlled the debt. And we've proposed legislation to help Americans' rebuild their nest eggs and college savings for their children. Unfortunately, the Democrats in control of Congress have chosen a go-it-alone approach. It's time for the President and the Democratic leadership in Congress to reverse course and embrace this opportunity for real bipartisan action to help put more Americans back to work."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/08/boehner-responds-to-fridays-unemployment-numbers/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just because he is single-handedly keeping the tanning bed workers employeed...
.... does NOT make him an expert on how to solve our economy woes. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. To say he's slick and smarmy is an insult to used car salesmen.
If I saw him slither over, I would run the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Show me the jobs created by Boehner and Bush in the last 8 years.
All I remember was that this administration spent the country into debt like a bunch of drunken sailors.

So when it comes to binges, lets look at the record for the last 8 years and and make our judgment on this "alone". Just as we would judge a job applicant for a position by looking at their past performance, so to should we look into the past to determine how to move forward in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Same guy who opposes Obama pick for Supreme Court before knowing who it is?
How can GOP pols charge others with partisan politics and arrogance when they do shit like that? If there was a god, seems he would be striking them dumb or dead on the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. As soon as they stop relying on the Heritage Foundation for all their economic data,
We might find areas of agreement with Boehner's party.
That will never happen though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, aren't you the guys that voted against the Stimulus Plan?
Edited on Fri May-08-09 09:38 AM by high density
Repukes talking about jobs is laughable. In 2001 they said the tax cuts would create millions of jobs. In 2008 it was still tax cuts. Now in 2009 there are no other ideas to speak of, and they just whine because they're being rightfully ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And their main source of jobs and tax revenue is from increased domestic oil production
at least, that's what their counter budget stated.
Drill baby drill is more than an energy policy for them, it's their economic policy as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Arrogance? Hey Boehner, look in the mirror. . . EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, like keep on using the same things that did not create jobs during the Bush reign.
And most of the few jobs that were created were low paying jobs that a person could not live on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. problem here appears to be the republican's definition of bipartisanship.
because for eight years their idea of bipartisanship has been the dems can either vote with them or not. i think the republicans ought to think long and hard about what they stand for and where they plan on being in a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm Going To Start Calling Him "Bipartisan Boner"





B-)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC