Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Drug Czar calls for end of "War on Drugs" analogy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:53 AM
Original message
White House Drug Czar calls for end of "War on Drugs" analogy
Edited on Thu May-14-09 12:58 AM by Uzybone
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124225891527617397.html


WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's new drug czar says he wants to banish the idea that the U.S. is fighting "a war on drugs," a move that would underscore a shift favoring treatment over incarceration in trying to reduce illicit drug use.

In his first interview since being confirmed to head the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday the bellicose analogy was a barrier to dealing with the nation's drug issues.

"Regardless of how you try to explain to people it's a 'war on drugs' or a 'war on a product,' people see a war as a war on them," he said. "We're not at war with people in this country."

Gil Kerlikowske, the new White House drug czar, signaled Wednesday his openness to rethinking the government's approach to fighting drug use.

Mr. Kerlikowske's comments are a signal that the Obama administration is set to follow a more moderate -- and likely more controversial -- stance on the nation's drug problems. Prior administrations talked about pushing treatment and reducing demand while continuing to focus primarily on a tough criminal-justice approach.



Hopefully we will get rid of the "czar" analogy along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. The war on drugs is indeed a war on people...
I'm optimistic that Kerlikowske's words will be followed with action. I'm less optimistic that congress will change the laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Indeed
it is refreshing to hear the top drug man in the country finally say that the war on drugs is a war on the people. One step at a time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Just changing the wording is not enough
For one - we need to legalize marijuana. Then probably an examination period before we decide how to handle other drugs. But just not calling it a "war on drugs", but having it be essentially the same thing is crap. I'd like to see a detailed plan of how this change to the "war on drugs" is going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. We should decriminalize possession of all drugs
Nobody should be punished under the law for simply possessing or using a substance. Whether or not we want them sold in stores is a different matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I tend to agree - to not do so creates gangs and funds CIA black ops
Which in my opinion is why drugs have stayed illegal - also keeps the population down and oppressed - a very effective ruling style - at least for a time - til people get pissed off enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Finally someone with some good sense
The "drug war" analogy was always a bad one. Not helpful is finding solutions at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. "and likely more controversial"-- that's corporate media bullshit, right there.
"controversial" to the folks with a vested interest in the status quo, maybe.

The American People don't want to spend $40 Billion a year fighting pot smoking. There is nothing controversial about de-escalating the stupid drug war. The only "controversial stance" would be to continue the dumb-ass tack we've taken for the past few decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. CNN.com, Pfizer's news arm, reported this as their lead story this morning:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. ROFL guess folks are going to have to smoke less to get the desired effect
Sounds healthier to me...But I'm guessing that is not what the article was trying to convey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. It's not the same thing you smoked at that Rolling Stones concert in 1974, parents!!!!
It's NOT! It's NOT! Boo!! Scary!!

:eyes:, absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama betrays us again!
I dunno how, but Ill figure it out and get back to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Hey - that's my line! Hrmph.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's he want to call it? "Operation Drug Freedom", maybe?
SSDD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and first Rec
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Just legalize it all. Tax and regulate it.
The government rakes in serious tax money, they stop making criminals out of otherwise law abiding people and get rid of the cartels in one fell swoop. When the fuck is this country going to grow up and deal with the shit like adults?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. Great news! I was recently chosen for a jury on a drug trial, but told the judge...
Edited on Thu May-14-09 06:53 AM by polichick
...that I didn't believe in America's War on Drugs so he let me go.

The hypocrisy surrounding this issue is astounding ~ alcohol and prescription drug abusers get away with anything; a kid smokes a joint and it's the end of the world. I can't wait for CHANGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Check out 'jury nullification'.
Juries can have unjust laws nullified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yeah, but I was honest and it was up to the judge whether to keep me or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. ah you should have stayed on ... re: jury nullification
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I guess I could have kept my feelings to myself and stayed...
Edited on Thu May-14-09 09:00 AM by polichick
The whole thing made me physically ill ~ all the cops and government agents involved in busting a street punk, while prescription users like Limbaugh get nothing.

Crack used by the poor vs cocaine used by the rich.

Alcohol vs pot.

Nothing but HYPOCRISY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. About time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. The Obama admin is still going to lock people up for marijuana use. They just won't call it a "war"
:whocares:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC