Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

These terrorists are criminals, not an army. Holding them as POWs or 'enemy combatants' is nonsense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 04:22 PM
Original message
These terrorists are criminals, not an army. Holding them as POWs or 'enemy combatants' is nonsense
I'm not an expert, but does anyone know how we dealt with international criminals in the past? Because it seems to me that's what we should be doing here. 9/11 was a crime--a terrible crime, but a crime nonetheless. The idea that it was an act of war, that we are "at war" with what amounts to a criminal gang, is the false premise that's driving all of these legal games.

These men are criminals, not members of a legitimate army of any description. That doesn't just take away their rights as POWs, it also restores their rights as criminal suspects. I honestly don't know what the rules are when a foreigner commits a crime against the US as far as capture, detention or trial, but it seems to me those are the rules we should be abiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with you
What the Repugs fail to understand is that they (the Repugs) have elevated this class of criminals to a higher status than that of a criminal. Always short sighted those Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What troubles me is that the Democrats are basing their opinions on these same falsehoods.
I expect nothing but crap from the GOP. I was hoping Obama would see fit to wipe this crap away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't restore their rights as criminal suspects.
Edited on Sat May-23-09 04:41 PM by Occam Bandage
It simply takes away their rights as POWs, while maintaining their rights as civilians detained by an army or occupying power for actions hostile to that power, which covered under the Fourth Geneva Convention. The Constitution does not apply and has never been extended to foreign nationals committing crimes in foreign nations during a military conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What about people we picked up in other countries--say Germany?
I recall one of the 'renditioned' guys was picked up in Germany and spirited off to a black site to be tortured etc.

I'm asking purely out of curiosity. What I'm wondering primarily is what does happen to these people under the law. The thing about POWs traditionally is that they were obviously members of an army, what with the uniforms and all. If a man is wearing regular civilian clothes and denies wrongdoing, mere suspicion doesn't seem like enough to hold them indefinitely to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've often said that bombing Afghanistan to get Al Qaeda
makes as much sense as bombing New Jersey to get the Mafia.

The Mafia or the yakuza are the best analogy for the typical terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. IIRC, The Blind Sheik was tried in a regular court for the first
bombing of the WTC. He is in jail right now.

Many countries have more experience than we with terrorist acts. They try people in their courts and put them in jail if they are found guilty. We could do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Return terrorist attacks to the American courtroom
Save real war, not cheap catch phrase fear mongering, for engaging NATIONS not people when diplomacy fails.

Bin Laden is not Iraqi and did not and does not live in Iraq yet we invade the country anyway and leave the "homeland" of bin Laden intact....

Fight wars against countries, arrest and try the criminals. Of course, you may not win elections if the people are not afraid. Huh Karl?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC