|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:45 AM Original message |
Turley Might Piss You Off, But That Doesn't Make Him "Dumb" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Sotomayor may piss off Turley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's True (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. For. The. Win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. LMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. exactly! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Stupid retort. Sotomayor doesn't "piss off" Turley, he just doesn't find judicial brilliance in her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Thanks, many DUers dislike Turley, because he dares to criticize Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. You don't pay attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. Yes, he "dares" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. He seemed pissed to me, this isn't silliness against Turley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. And his reasoning for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. comment fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:50 PM Response to Reply #20 |
40. Turley had his opinion written before he knew who was appointed and just filled in her name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
46. Your statement assumes that Turley is being honest about his criticisms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
51. Can you or Turley give us an example of a jurist who meets those lofty standards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
2. Just a pompous and puristic horse's patootie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. No but he's an arrogant pompous jerk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
6. No, plenty of other things make Turley dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BonnieJW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. What??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. So it was brilliant of him to say that he believes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. What's Your Definition Of Dumb? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. People like Turley and the people who like Turley. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
9. He might have a big mouth, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
10. No, it means it makes him one of the good ole Beltway boys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. After the way he's trashed Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
11. Between saying Sotomayor and Thurgood Marshall lack intellectual depth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
14. Yeah, But Now I Question His Judgement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I've been saying that for months now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
15. However...had the right to claim Sotomayor was "intellecutally lacking.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
18. Nope....just makes him an elitist ass.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
19. He is intellectually dishonest and that makes him.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
22. Does anyone remember a couple of months ago when half of us were mad at Krugman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
23. maybe Rachel will give him a chance to explain why he said she lacks intellectual depth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
24. The folks I would like to hear from are his fellow faculty members. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PopSixSquish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
25. Well I Can Think of Several Adjectives I'd Use to Describe Him at the Moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
26. I don't think he is dumb. I think he can be too melodramatic. Some reactions seem Knee-Jerk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
27. He is not dumb, just an arrogant prick who thinks he is right all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
30. His arroagance and prickishness makes me dismiss his opinions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
33. He handed the RW talking points against Sotomayor - and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. It's even worse than that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. A copycat with the academic "depth" to assert RW ideology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:25 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Yep, he is, with a capital A, lol! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
34. He is a RW hack who happens to be for torture prosecution because it causes a problem for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. This is why I don't get why KO and RM adore him so much. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
37. but, what if he is right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
39. Turley may spill out stuff you already believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
42. Attacking Thurgood Marshall DOES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. Damn right. I could kick his ass for trying to diminish Judge Marshall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
43. Dishonest intellectually to make a buck, and blames others for being less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
47. Eh Turley is still okay with me-it was just one opinion and he wanted someone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
50. He's not dumb. He's just a dick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
52. He's not dumb. He's just a pompous, one-note jackass. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
53. LOL! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
54. Not dumb but a douchebag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
55. No, it just makes him a stuck-up asshole who is in love with himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
56. Turley was on the good side for most people here until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boomerang Diddle (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 02:43 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Yeah Right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 02:51 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. That's brought up now, but not for the past 8 years when he, rightly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boomerang Diddle (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 03:01 AM Response to Reply #58 |
59. And if he had anything positve to say about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 07:39 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Here's proof. Read this thread and count how many on it are supporting Turley and how many aren't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 03:28 AM Response to Original message |
60. I'm not qualified to assess Turley's assessment, and neither are most here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
61. Turley may appear on tv a lot, but that doesn't make him infallible -- or even "smart" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-28-09 04:32 AM Response to Original message |
63. k*r ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC