Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Rachel omit that Clinton also nominated Sotomayor from her little

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
carpe diem Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:07 PM
Original message
Why did Rachel omit that Clinton also nominated Sotomayor from her little
demonstration? That struck me as rather dishonest and manipulative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's her MO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I happen to be watching since AI is done... and I'm very disappointed in her
shitting all over the first Hispanic woman nominee because she may not be as "liberal" as Rachel wants. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What is a person who is very liberal to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, I am very liberal, but I have no problem with
a moderate liberal Hispanic female voice being added to the court! I don't expect a perfect judge and I realize some compromises will be necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Just like they compromised with Alito and Roberts?
I would have held out for someone more in keeping with what I am sure we all really want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. no...not like Alito and Roberts (obviously)
:eyes: I REALLY WANT Sotomayor, assuming she provides a liberal perspective and a perspective in keeping with her life experiences and upbringing. I am hopeful that she will provide the balance necessary and that she will fight for our side. If that turns out to not be the case, well... we can cross that bridge when the time comes. Maybe send her endless supplies of cigarettes or something. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Be honest about reporting facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes god forbid we care about a SC nominees interpretation of the law.
She's a women and she's Hispanic woo hoo!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What's done is done. Why don't you wait and see if
she turns out to be a stealth repug before jumping to conclusions? Why take away from the moment because of unfounded fears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. How about I continue investigating her record for myself?
I don't need to, nor should I, "wait" to do that.

This whole "why don't you wait" thing is merely code for "shut the fuck up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not the first time she omitted facts or
distorted the record to slam Obama. No wonder her ratings are tanking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Her ratings are tanking?
Source?

That would be bad news and a broader level than whether or not you think she's "unfair" to Obama. MSNBC has been fast becoming the left-leaning counter to FOXNews, and we really ought to support that. Even if that means some of the pundits say some things we don't always agree with.

I mean, compare being upset with Rachel that she's "too strident in her anti-torture / prosecute criminals stance" with what you find on CNN or FOX. I'd take that any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Just search the word "tanking." There are links with the ratings. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Its true. there was a big thread on it. Search the board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Yup. She did the same thing when she left out the most important part
of Robert Gibbs' answer to a reporter about how Obama is different from Bush re: military tribunals. I started a thread about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. She has been using "partial" reporting for a while now.
VERY dishonest and disappointing. It's something usually reserved for RWers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't have cable - but can you list some specific examples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Look above the post of mine that you responded to. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's how she rolls. So far my only real honest show host is Ed...
KO is on probation because of his love for Turley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Ed is very genuine and real.
Rachel...I generally used to like her even though she is further to the left then me. However, her tactics of using half truths to promote an ultra leftist agenda leaves me cold. There are more honest ways to go about it and she is not helping to influence debate or move Obama to the left in any positive way at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Did Rachel look at any of Sonia's judicial
record or was it just some pumped up little demo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC