Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Disruption of Congress or Corruption of Congress--Single Payer Trial for the Baucus 13

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:50 PM
Original message
Disruption of Congress or Corruption of Congress--Single Payer Trial for the Baucus 13



The Congress is in bed with the Insurance industry and the WH goes along with this CORRUPTION.

THE TRUE heroes are below--they get handcuffed while congress enjoys its health benefits.




http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/05/27-4

Published on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 by CommonDreams.org


Disruption of Congress or Corruption of Congress?
Single Payer Trial for the Baucus 13

Single Payer Action

Seven of the Baucus 13 were arraigned in Washington, D.C. Superior Court this morning.

The Baucus 13 are doctors, nurses, lawyers and other single payer advocates who stood up before Senator Max Baucus and the Senate Finance Committee during hearings on May 5 and May 12 and demanded that a single payer advocate be allowed to testify.

Senator Baucus called 41 witnesses over three days of hearings on health care reform – not one of which was a single payer advocate.

The Baucus 13 were handcuffed, arrested, and now face charges of “disruption of Congress.”

Seven of the thirteen – Dr. Margaret Flowers, Dr. Pat Salomon, Dr. Carol Paris, Russell Mokhiber, Kevin Zeese, Mark Dudzik, and Adam Schneider – pled not guilty this morning.

The remaining six – Katie Robbins, Dr. Judy Dasovich, Dr. Steve Fenichel, Sue Cannon, DeAnn McEwan, and Jerry Call – will be arraigned later this week and next month.

A status hearing for the Baucus 13 was set for June 22 before Judge Harold L. Cushenberry.

The Baucus 13 are being represented by criminal defense attorneys Ann Wilcox and James Klimaski.

If they go to trial, the Baucus 13 will probably face a trial date sometime in the early fall.

Prosecutors this morning asked that the Baucus 13 be ordered to stay away from the Dirksen Senate Office Building – the scene of the single payer actions on May 5 and May 12.

But after objections from Klimaski, the presiding DC judge ordered the defendants to stay away from Dirksen “except for formal business – meaning other than protests.”

“Senator Baucus is charging us with ‘disruption of Congress,’” said Russell Mokhiber of Single Payer Action. “We are charging Senator Baucus with corruption of Congress. We believe we have a stronger case.”................................................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Disruption of Congress?
Should be some kind of award for that, not charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Congress decided to put them in cuffs instead of just
asking them to leave. Shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimWis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I appreciate the information. Thanks for posting. These 13
people will help bring attention to the cause and their fight for single payer insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. 59 percent of U.S. doctors favor single-payer Medicare for all.



According to a recent survey in The Annals of Internal Medicine, 59 percent of U.S. doctors favor single-payer Medicare for all.

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN31432035
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Makes sense. I got friends in medical industry considering a move
Billing becomes a nightmare for small firms. Instead of getting paid up front, a set amount that is documented prior to the service, they have to chase both insurance companies and the private people to pay their bills, and there is no telling when they will get paid. Bundle that in with insurance premiums they pay for practicing, you got a mess on your hands.

Its really tough for medical firms to project profits and costs, and allocate funds accordingly. They may be able to estimate how many people need Operation A a year, they do not know what the average compensation they receive will be for Operation A (since each payer may have an agreement to pay a different rate, and individuals have all sorts of different payers). One year, they may get half their patients come in with one type of insurance that pays rate 1 and another company that pays rate 2, and the next year maybe only 30% of the operations will receive rate 1. Administrating private and public facilities alike becomes a nightmare under a multiple provider/multiple rate system where providers may even choose not to pay at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good stuff! ... Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. and read on..Baucus has taken more contributions than others and


he has the nerve to arrest those folks who just want to be heard!!

...............http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/05/27-4


According to a recent analysis by the public interest group Consumer Watchdog, Senator Baucus, the leading architect of health reform in the Congress, has received more campaign contributions from the health insurance and pharmaceutical corporations than any other current Democratic member of the House or Senate.

According to the report, Senator Baucus received $183,750 from health insurance companies and $229,020 from drug companies in the last two election cycles.

During recent Senate Finance Committee hearings on health care reform, Baucus has refused to allow even one person to testify on behalf of a single payer health care system.

According to recent polls, single payer is supported by a majority of Americans, doctors and health economists.

Baucus has been repeatedly asked over the past months to allow a single payer advocate to testify.

He has steadfastly refused
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. CORRUPTION OF CONGRESS is a stronger case.
And it's 100% correct.

Senator Baucus is doing a disservice to his constituents by not investigating ALL OPTIONS.

He is an example of why our government no longer works for the people paying the bills. He should be removed from office at the earliest opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It is almost incomprehensible that Baucus is not
even allowing single payer to be heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick for the night shift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC