Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Left Out of D-Day Events, Queen Elizabeth Is Fuming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:38 PM
Original message
Left Out of D-Day Events, Queen Elizabeth Is Fuming
By JOHN F. BURNS
Published: May 27, 2009

LONDON — Queen Elizabeth is not amused.

Indeed, she is decidedly displeased, angry even, that she was not invited to join President Obama and France’s president, Nicolas Sarkozy, next week at commemorations of the 65th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, according to reports published in Britain’s mass-circulation tabloid newspapers on Wednesday. Pointedly, Buckingham Palace did not deny the reports.

The queen, who is 83, is the only living head of state who served in uniform during World War II. As Elizabeth Windsor, service number 230873, she volunteered as a subaltern in the Women’s Auxiliary Territorial Service, training as a driver and a mechanic. Eventually, she drove military trucks in support roles in England.

While serving, she met the supreme Allied commander for the D-Day landings, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, and developed a fondness for him, according to several biographies. This prompted Queen Elizabeth, who was crowned in June 1953, to say in later years that he was the American president with whom she felt most at ease.

But on June 6, when Mr. Obama and Mr. Sarkozy attend commemorations at the iconic locations associated with the American D-Day assault — Utah Beach, the town of Ste.-Mère-Église, where the first United States paratroopers landed, and the American war cemetery at Colleville-sur-Mer — the highest-ranking British representative will be Prime Minister Gordon Brown. His main role will be at ceremonies at the town of Arromanches, near the beaches where British troops landed.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/world/europe/28queen.html?_r=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't blame her. Seems kind of rude to me. I hope someone
invites her right quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep. Gotta agree with her
Edited on Thu May-28-09 03:44 PM by supernova
She should be there.

The only reason I could think they didn't invite her was her age/not feeling well? But she's still very spry. So. :shrug:

edit: Someone needs to clunk Gordon on the head. He should have found out and cleared that up for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah, someone screwed the pooch on this one.
The question is whether it was was the French or the British. Either way, she should have been invited.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why didn't Gordon Brown have her invited?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Zat would be Nicolas Sarkozy's responsibility based on protocol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I wonder why he didn't
It stands to reason that she should have been invited. Then again, Brown should have pointed out the slight when it could have been rectified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Of course it's Sarkozy's doing. The guy was wearing lifts when Obama met him in France
He'll do anything to keep the attention on him. If the Aueen is there it will be all about President Obama and the Queen.

As soon as Obama was out of 'boot in the ass' range, he started talking shit about him through "aides familiar with ..."

The guy is a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. She looked cute in her uniform:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. very cute!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, this is not right. She should be there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. A bit more from the article, I'd place the blame on Brown&co.
"The French have also said the Brown government was slow to accept that the ceremonies merited more than a modest British involvement, since British policy had been to give full-scale government backing only to commemorations at decade-long intervals."
(clip)
"The tabloids quoted anonymous palace officials as saying the Brown government dropped the ball, possibly because of reported strains between Mr. Brown and the queen. Among other issues, the queen is said to have cooled on Mr. Brown because of his habit of appearing late for their weekly audiences. The Daily Mail quoted one “senior palace official” as saying that the palace had made clear to the government that the queen would have liked to have gone to Normandy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. G. Brown better invite the Queen right quick
or his next gift from Obama might be a Sham-Wow towel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's like Plant and Page not inviting John Paul Jones to jam...
I don't like this at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. WOW
I would consider that even more egregious.

Damn...I wish that I were old enough to have been able to see Zepplin and Traffic when they were young
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. My mom wouldn't let me when I had the chance at age 16...
Then my stupid boyfriend went with a pal of his, after FORBIDDING me to go with my sister! I was 19... and a stupid girl for letting that bully do that to me!

I never saw Zep... *sob* but I did see Plant on several solo tours. Not the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. A real screw up but
They still have time to fix it and have her there. I would bet that someone could come up with a little extra pomp & such to honor the Queen as the only head of state attending that actually served during the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. #1 reason she should be there
'only head of state attending that actually served during the war"


Damn, she outlived them all.

Good on ya, Yer Majesty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. If she goes, she and Michelle can keep in touch!
Or is Michelle going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. At least they should have had Prince Charles there?
was he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Forget Charlie...he can stay with the ponies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. he's next in line
his 'Mum' is getting old maybe she ddin't want to travel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He be in a wheelchair by the time mum kicks the pail....give it Randy Andy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yep, if she follows her mother's footsteps.
The Queen Mother was over 100 when she passed away.

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaplainM Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe there was concern that Prince Harry and Prince Philip
..would show up dressed in their matching Wehrmacht uniforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. lol
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. HA!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Shame on you for calling her a 'b***. Democrats do NOT need that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Hey, no need to call her that.
She's not my favorite person by far, but she's now just a little old lady.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes, and a little old lady who did her part for her country when it counted.
She really belongs there, and I hope that the ceremonies are jiggered around so that she can take a dignified role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I agree.
She and her sister too, let alone their parents, did their part for Britain. As the only world leader who is still alive from that era, she should have been invited. Crass oversight!!

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yes, during WWII, the royals set an example of courage and hope.
They didn't even leave London when Buckingham Palace was bombed. That took guts, and was important not only for Britain but for her allies others working and hoping for the defeat of Nazi Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sad really, this woman, as heir to the British Throne, donned the
Edited on Fri May-29-09 05:18 PM by rasputin1952
uniform of her nation and served during one of the perilous times in that country.

As a Head of State, and particularly since she served, she should indeed stand with others as they commemorate that day.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC