Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radio caller totally nailed it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:18 PM
Original message
Radio caller totally nailed it.
Edited on Fri May-29-09 01:22 PM by cooolandrew
The radio caller said of course Sotomayor will be progressively she's been working her way to the top watching her back and her words, with the latino woman comment taken totally out of context. The caller said the woman was raised in the Bronx of course she'll have a progressive nature from that alone. Now she's arrived at the big time so chances are there is likely less cause for her to be as moderate as she may of been in the past. An awesome choice a strong woman the court is beginning to roll the right way I have no doubt. The beinning of great change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. The bigger question is: why do progressives have to "watch their backs"?
There was never any question about the political leanings of Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia, etc. They were all promoted as strong conservatives.

Why the fuck can't we just stand up and celebrate someone who's a "strong" progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well I'd take it as a positive she was smart enough to see the smear campaign before it arrived. >
Edited on Fri May-29-09 01:27 PM by cooolandrew
And gave them little to work on. In an ideal world where media and big business didn't work against us I'm sure she could of made a less cautious trail through the courts but sadly, ideal ain't where we live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. "the woman was raised in the Bronx of course she'll have a progressive nature from that alone."
Where have I heard something oh-so similar to that before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well Barack as far as making a level playing field for workers is doing great work. The military >
Edited on Fri May-29-09 01:38 PM by cooolandrew
industrial complex is whole different beast to contend with. If the poltical will was there on other issues it seems clear to me the President would of forged that path. So that's where the remainder comes down to activism. His whole campaign indicated he will be confined by establishment for the real light out the darkness the people have to be the ones they've been waiting for. To my mind Sotomayer is a reason to be cheerul although everyone is very welcome to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's classic projection. There is no "of course" about it.
We'll see if she adopts a progressive approach to her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yeah, thank GOD she didn't grow up in Queens or Trenton or a poor southern town
Edited on Fri May-29-09 02:47 PM by jgraz
Cuz we know how that turns out:

Born in Trenton, grew up in Queens



Born and raised in Trenton



Born in Pin Point, Georgia



I guess the Bronx has some magic liberal pixie dust that gets sprinkled on everyone.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. This no or slight change; Souter is a very progressive and fair-minded justice.
Change will only come when we get rid of Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito. And that is not going to happen anytime soon. It is a much more realistic view that Obama will be replacing Stevens and/or Ginsburg. Thus we at least remain staus quo if Obama does a good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh yeah I understand the numbers, but sometimes the addition of one can be a big impact alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC