Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmakers ready for third battle over photo ID at polls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:07 PM
Original message
Lawmakers ready for third battle over photo ID at polls
AAS 1/26/08
Lawmakers ready for third battle over photo ID at polls
At least 150,000 registered voters in Texas don't have the kind of identification that the Legislature has considered requiring, a legislative committee is told
By Laylan Copelin
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Saturday, January 26, 2008

At least 150,000 registered voters in Texas —about 1 percent — don't have the kind of government-issued photo identification that the Legislature has considered requiring at Texas polls, a legislative committee was told Friday.

Voters without photo identification tend to be women or minorities and elderly, poor or disabled, witnesses told the House Elections Committee.

"There's a huge swath of our population who are poor, don't have cars and live on the margins," said Tova Wang, an elections expert at the Century Foundation, a liberal-leaning nonprofit research organization based in New York City. "They have a right to vote."

(snip)
Voter fraud occurs in Texas, they testified, but it is rare.

When fraud does occur, it's unlikely the scam involves impersonating someone else at the polls, and there is no evidence that illegal immigrants are lining up in droves to vote. Instead, the handful of prosecutions for voter fraud in Texas usually involve mail-in absentee ballots or voter registration.


Laylan Copelin did one of the better jobs covering the hearing. He was there most of the grueling 9 hours of it.
:applause: to Laylan!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. ID views heat up voter fraud hearing
Dallas Morning News 1/25/08
ID views heat up voter fraud hearing

Backers pressed on level of poll 'impersonations,' whether proof needed Backers pressed on whether requiring proof at polls deters violators

09:53 PM CST on Friday, January 25, 2008
By KAREN BROOKS / The Dallas Morning News
kmbrooks @ dallasnews.com

AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has prosecuted 22 cases of voting or other election fraud in nearly six years, and none would have been prevented with a law requiring photo IDs at polling stations, officials from his office told state lawmakers on Friday.

Most involved mailed ballots, which were exempt from proposed photo ID bills that Republican lawmakers twice tried unsuccessfully to pass in Texas, and only one actually happened at the polls, said Eric Nichols, the state's deputy attorney general for criminal justice.

His testimony kicked off a contentious daylong hearing on voter fraud by the House Elections Committee. The hearing occasionally degenerated into shouting matches and accusations, with some witnesses near tears.


The near tears witness would be Texas GOP Chairwoman Tina Benkiser who got so flustered for being called to the carpet by Lon Burnam over her comments in the Vo/Heflin match, that she just had to well up some emotion to make a quick exit. :eyes:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are these legislators addressing the voter fraud
that they were caught perpetrating on video in the House chamber? Naw!! I didn't think so.
Did our fearless attorney general go after the legislators who were clearly committing actual VOTE fraud? Naw, once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Of course not
Debbie Riddle the most active multiple voting legislator in that video authored one of the voter ID bills. Again the law does not apply to them. And if they could really have it their way it would only apply to people who vote for Democrats. :grr:

Here's the link for the YouTube link for Debbie's law breaking multiple votes at the Lege.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. They don't know what they are getting into
If a picture ID law passes I will be the first one in line at the voter registrar's office demanding a FREE picture ID.

Of course they will ask if I have a driver's license and I will say "That's none of your damned business. Now give me my FREE picture ID."

I love to make trouble and that law would be an invitation to all troublemakers like me.

It could turn into a movement. We could all march in, sing a verse of Alice's Restaurant, and demand a FREE picture ID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Believe me - we'll be part ot that free ID mobilization too
But keep in mind that free isn't free. You still have to have your birth certificate or some other documentation to get your free ID. If you have that great. What if you don't? You have to order those documents from our state, or some other state and that costs money. So before we go down the path of let's screw with them on the monetary costs part, we have to fight like hell in advance to just cut it off before it goes into place.

Every time they bring up Mexico as an example of the country where you have to have ID to vote, I think oh sure we should hold of Mexico as an example of a country with "free and fair" elections. There's no fraud in Mexican elections because they have voter photo ID.
:wtf:

Are they nuts? And the government does provide that ID for free, but it does cost their government a lot of money to do it too.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Texas Observer blog post
The Texas Observer blog 1/26/08
A Few Halting Steps Toward the Middle

(snip)
Of course, there was plenty of time for the old favorite lines about voter ID: You need a photo ID to rent a movie, but not to vote? asks one side. Why not ask for a blood sample while we’re at it? asks the other. At one point, committee chairman Leo Berman held up a voter’s license card bearing both a photo and a thumbprint on the back. Perhaps sensing Democrats’ sympathies for all things south-of-the-border, he asked if anyone knew where the card came from. "Mexico!" he said, "You can’t vote in Mexico without a photo ID."

Berman was surprisingly receptive not only toward the Mexican electoral system, but also toward a proposal for a photo ID law that would let voters without a driver’s license sign their name as proof of identity, instead.

The plan would avoid adding extra paperwork or expense to voting, while adding an extra level of security to the process. After the hearing, Dallas Democratic Rep. Rafael Anchia — the committee’s most outspoken opponent of past voter ID bills — called it an interesting proposal, and wondered at why the Republican leadership seemed so receptive. Past legislation had given voters the chance to vote a provisional ballot without a photo ID, but Anchia and other critics have repeatedly pointed out that most provisional ballots are never counted. This time, though, Berman was talking about dropping the provisional requirement.


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yanez Houston Jordan Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Recommenation no. 5 (I love to see important Texas forum discussions on the greatest page!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for keeping us informed of this
And thanks to Laylan. This ugliness needs to stop. Underneath this, it is nothing more than Xenophobia and racism on the part of the Republicans and I'm glad to see it coming out as such.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry L. Burks Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. What are they talking about her. I just don't get it.
Oh. wait a minute. Now I do.
The Voter's Laws made to prevent people from committing Voter fraud.
Voting more than once.
They can not be written to deny one from voting
No one can vote that is not qualify to do so.
And every body that is legal to vote.
Gets to vote. With out question.
What are their goals?
Make the laws so that every body the is eligible to vote.
Get's to vote.
That's not what their doing here.
They are writing the laws in just such a way.
In the name of preventing voter fraud. About 20 people.
That would prevent. About 3,000,0000 people from voting.
The voting laws are to be clean cut and work.
Every body gets o vote.
But if you muddy the water. Confuse the masses.
Make it an endless maze. That no one can make it through.
Through obstacle in their way. That they have to find a way around.
A obstacle course of biblical proportion.
In which there are no survivor.
They have did every thing with in their powers to prevent any body from voting.
A 180 out from what the law requires them to.
Why would any body do some thing like this.
Oh I get it. The Republicans want to win electron at any cost.
What kind of fools do they play us for?
With the computers and the technology that we have now days.
One computer that can be bought for less than $700 dollars has enough power and memory. And the programs .
That there shouldn't be any voter fraud.
When I go to buy gas. And I use a created card.
Every penny is counted.
I get a paper trail.
No one has access to my account but me.
No one has ever refused me the right to use my card because they don't know who I am.
And I'm not he only one that uses a fuel card.
No one knows by business.
This happens every day. All over the world. Every penny is accounted for.
And the state tell me that they can't do the some thing for one day with the counting election votes.
They are playing us for fools.
They don't need a photo ID.
There are way that they can check out who your are with in seconds. And they would know right a way if you were eligible to vote or not.
Just like the files on a computer.
They can be given a pin number that only you will know about.
A person would only be allow to vote once.
And if the computer show that you are voting twice. A red flag pops up. And right a way you will know that some one is going to jail
If they want to use a photo to prevent voter fraud. They can take one. Electronically at the voting both.
It can be part of your paper trail.
But if you are given a pin number that is on your paper work.
You can check right then or later is see if your vote is the same as your paper work.
And if it's not.
Some body has to go to jail.
If the final vote is written in stone. Their are disk that can be written to only.
They can't be changed at a later date. If every step through the election process. There is made a write only disk. The record of every body vote is written in stone. They can't change the paper trail if you are the holder of the paper records,. It can not be changed a later date.
If you are the holder of to photographs.
That is another thing that some one else can change at a later date.
But if they are doing spot checks. Every five minute. And these spot checks are also writhen in stone.
A cross reference by an out side source.
There would be no room for cheating.
They can make it so that any where along the line.
If the vote count changes. They would know where it happened at.
If all events where video through out the voting process.
Right a way you would know who did what when. There would be no lie your way out of it.
Jail time.
When you know about all the things that they can do now days.
That would fix this problem. Right a way for pennies on the dollar.
It becomes blatantly obvious why they are doing the thinks that they are doings.
They want to keep the system the way it is now or make it easer to rig elections.
Or ways to hide the fact that they are rigging elections.
Either they want to clean up the election process or the don't.
They will be judges by their actions.
Every body is watching this time.
They would go so far to lie to you to keep on rigging elections.
Some one needs to stand up and call them on it.
You can allow people to vote electronically.
There are a number of ways to prevent any one from rigging the election.
And if they don't take these steps to do this.
They refuses to have honest elections.
Because they want to going on cheating a business as unseal.
Either they want fair elections. Or they are blowing smoke.
There is no gray area.
The ones that refuse to implement the checks and balances. The cross records.
The paper trail

When you are voting electronically.
There is no need to destroy public record.
They used to tell us that they destroyed the ballets Because they were taking up to much storage space.
IF it is done electronically. One disk would have the hole electron on it.
You could make as many backup copy of it as you want.
There would be the original and many back up copy's.
And the paper trail of my vote.
It's going to be in my shirt pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Video link
I posted this to the registration database purges thread, but I'll post it again here in case anyone has 9 hours to kill. Just kidding. It was nine hours but you can certainly just watch bits of it.

I would recommend the expert panel at about 3 hours and 25 minutes into the video. It's real audio media format.

You can watch the experts who traveled from out of state.

* Justin Levitt, Counsel, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
* David Becker, Senior Litigation Counsel, People for the American Way
* Tova Wang, Democracy Fellow, The Century Foundation
* Dr. Toby Moore, Project Manager, Center for Democracy and Election Management, American University

Archive 1/25/08 hearing

Enjoy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Some Mexican women lose right to vote
MSNBC 1/27/08
Some Mexican women lose right to vote

SANTA MARIA QUIEGOLANI, Mexico - Women in this Indian village high in the pine-clad mountains of Oaxaca rise each morning at 4 a.m. to gather firewood, grind corn, prepare the day’s food, care for the children and clean the house.

But they aren’t allowed to vote in local elections, because — the men say — they don’t do enough work.

It was here, in a village that has struggled for centuries to preserve its Zapotec traditions, that Eufrosina Cruz, 27, decided to become the first woman to run for mayor — despite the fact that women aren’t allowed to attend town assemblies, much less run for office.

(snip)

Cruz figured her case for annulling the elections was solid — after all, Mexico’s constitution guarantees both men and women the right to vote. She went first to the Oaxaca state electoral council, then to the state congress. After both upheld the election, she took her fight to the commission in Mexico City.

"I am not asking anything for myself. I am asking on behalf of Indian women, so that never again will the laws allow political segregation," Cruz wrote to the commissioners, who may take months to investigate the case, and who could recommend that state authorities protect women’s rights to vote or hold office. She says she’ll go higher, to federal electoral authorities, if necessary.


This is the wonderful Mexican electoral system that the Rs in Texas are pushing as a good example. After all they have photo ID requirements.

You know I'm going to pass on their customs, I think our election system without photo ID is better than this one. But I am thankful that women like Cruz are standing up to these unjust and ridiculous rules.

Sonia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Martin Frost's essay on Politico

Tips to Lone Star Project which sent this out today.

Politico blog 1/29/08

Photo ID laws are snapshots of an ugly past

By: Martin Frost
January 29, 2008

Once upon a time, in the dark ages of American politics, white Southerners conspired to prevent blacks from voting by passing a series of restrictive voter registration laws, including poll taxes and literacy tests.

These practices were outlawed by Congress with passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The figurative descendents of the people who tried to restrict black suffrage are here.

Their tack is to require a picture ID to be shown by anyone seeking to vote.

An Indiana law imposing such a requirement has been challenged, and its fate will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that was argued before the court on Jan. 9.

Challenging the adoption of this and other voter photo ID laws is the single-biggest civil rights issue facing the country today.

(snip)

Martin Frost, a Democrat, represented the Dallas-Fort Worth area in Congress from 1979 to 2005. He rose to caucus chairman and head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. He is now an attorney with Polsinelli Shalton Flanigan Suelthaus PC in Washington and serves as president of America Votes, a grass-roots voter mobilization and education effort.


Much more of the essay at the link above.

Sonia


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC