Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghanistan: many questions, no answers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:04 AM
Original message
Afghanistan: many questions, no answers
Having not gone to Iraq with the U.S., we've snapped to attention anyway — and just at the moment when military action against terrorism is proving spectacularly counterproductive.

What are we doing in Afghanistan? Do we know? Are we afraid to ask? The lack of public debate over this indicates that we are. It's not a good sign.

Parents and children are seen on TV bidding tearful farewells to their soldier husbands and wives, fathers and mothers, as military authorities warn that the Kandahar region, which Canada has taken over from the Americans, is the most dangerous part of Afghanistan and that the public must know “there will be casualties.” There have been already.

In order to send soldiers off to risk their lives, the cause must be great. What is it? As explanation, what we have mainly is General Rick Hillier, head of the Armed Forces, telling us that “we have to fight them over there so we won't have to fight them over here.” This echo of a failed Vietnam War era slogan (“If we don't fight them in Hanoi, we'll have to fight them in San Diego”) is as hollow now as it was then, although it is more coherent than his offering of last summer about having to fight “scumbags.”

http://www.rabble.ca/news_full_story.shtml?sh_itm=d0d3c925bba2154dee3f89668b95025d&rXn=1&
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hillier strikes me as a gung-ho guy who would readily get
our troops involved in dangerous situations that would have little to do with peacekeeping. I don't trust him at all. He is chock full of empty rhetoric that is, indeed, very similar to that heard across the border.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmmm, welcome to DU
The mission in Afghanistan has changed from the original mission under NATO, that is the point. Canada was supportive of PEACEKEEPING and reconstruction duties for our troops NOT combat under US command.

Tell me, are you upset that the US pulled most of their troops OUT of Afghanistan in order to invade Iraq? Shouldn't the focus of the US be on Afghanistan instead of Iraq seeing as it was their "two towers" that were attacked? Should Canada help the US pull out even more troops so they can attack Iran or some other country? Should our soldiers be sacrificed for bush's wet dream?

Hillier was war-mongering, it is as simple as that.

Canada is not much of a target seeing as we serve as peacekeepers, at least we did until recently, thanks to the change in mission.

I supported the original mission in Afghanistan, the peace-keeping and reconstruction one, I do NOT support the change in their mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC