|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
regularjoe (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 05:50 PM Original message |
What happened with the NH recount? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. There have been several threads already on NH recount. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. it was recounted . . . and just as Kerry said . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. No, Kerry still won. NH, remember? Blue state! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. last week they did not find anything irregular going on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 07:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Don't forget Nader picked up 3 votes gained .000036% n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 01:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berniew1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. There were close states Kerry lost that needed recount. Why N H??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 07:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The idea was that this was a Blue state where they wouldn't have to hassle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 01:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Having lived in NH for many years (now in MA) . . . one need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-04 07:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Supposedly they wanted to hit a state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 01:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. New Hampshire was chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowDoginthehouse (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 01:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. not til January 20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 01:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. The exit polls were discounted as being erroneous . . . even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfrrfrrfr (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 02:02 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Posts like these make me wish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 02:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. It does not factually prove Bush did get all the votes he got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 02:48 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. That's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 03:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. there is a paradox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 04:38 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. No they don't have to justify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 06:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. what you are talking about IS justification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 02:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Absolutely. We didn't get to recount the whole state even. Only examined |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KatieB (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 11:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. They only recounted 11 precincts out of over 100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-04-04 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. How do you know those were the real ballots they "recounted"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC