|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:17 PM Original message |
Anyone want to interpret this OH SC ruling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not even that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. There's no "simply" in a 12(b)(6) rule nisi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Higans (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 01:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
62. What about this fact: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Pretty much my read. Why isn't this Big news on DU????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. because most people that would attempt to say so . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. I know what you mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. well, perhaps they should rename the group: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 11:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
57. OH, and your forgot . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 08:49 AM Response to Reply #26 |
66. This does not warrant saying "Gosh, I think this may be over" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. #$%^@! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Well Jeez it's not like it's a fishing expedition with no indication of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Will, aside from the obvious... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
north houston dem (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. So now it's put up or shut up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Will, your analysis isn't correct. I'll do a detailed analysis of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Here is the new thread and the analysis such as it is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procinderella (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
50. The truth will out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hi rox63. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfrrfrrfr (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Also This is NOT the Presidential contest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. thank you for clarifying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Faye, does this mean that Kerry's motion filed yesterday for discovery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Thanks! I hope I didn't sound too dumb with that question! LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. Faye is correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
procinderella (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
54. Remember, new people are checking in everyday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. It is the wellllll thought out CASE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. But the same logic would apply. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. If this one is blocked, this justice is the one that will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. I think that's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. This may answer my other question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Could be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. He filed Moss vs Bush first. And in the original filing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. I seem to remember that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. A lawyer who does not listen to the judge????? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bush_is_wacko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Okay, this blows that theory out of the water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Thanks for the welcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. While awaiting Truman's opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
15. A lawyers interpretation of what the Ruling on Arnebeck's suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. So is it safe to assume... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. As I said, I'll let you put the pieces together.... I don't understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. My brain is going to explode... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. This absolutely slays me, I have been trying to figure out Arnebeck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Hello righteous1. I haven't seen you in a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:49 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Good to be back ,thanx. Yea Moritz is a great site, only way for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 11:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
58. I agree I have been checking out Moritz for a few weeks. It helps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Hard to believe two horrible errors in a row from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. How much has Arnebeck collected and has he given an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97 (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. I am surprised - I have hear Cliff A. speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liam97 (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 09:50 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I strongly encourage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. I'm with ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
georgia10 (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Excellent point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. ok, I'll buy that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. But would that be fraud? Sounds more akin to obstruction of justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. But how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
52. Agreed, and doesn't fraud by it's very definition need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
42. Well, "particularity" is in the eye of the beholder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #42 |
63. You can see the petition. There are links around. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 12:53 AM Response to Reply #15 |
61. "This is a junior error or some sort of unknown strategy." That was my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 04:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
64. I'm confused: isn't the present ruling in Moss v. Moyer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truman01 (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Yes I think you are right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thanatonautos (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 11:08 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. OK. Thanks. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
49. Hey at least we are gona keep the freepers guessing at which case is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. They don't have the capacity to understand. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dancing_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-28-04 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
56. Moss and Arnebeck should never have filed this case to begin with! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfrrfrrfr (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 12:07 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Um all of you are missing the strategic context and the big picture here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfrrfrrfr (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 12:18 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. I would suggest you read the update on DKOS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
65. Deleted message |
read the law first (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 09:25 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. That's just a citation to a previous case from 1999. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Verve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 09:42 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. AGREE! This is not about the Nov 2 election. This is about the second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC