http://flickr.com/photos/17355361@N00
These two images will print on the front and back of most 3" x 2" business cards. This is the first, and we (kamqute and I) thought we'd link to it here to obtain feedback.
kamqute will be printing on actual business cards, and I will be using copy paper and a papercutter. We will be leaving them anywhere we go. Suggestions for more links for the front are welcome. Though the focus was initially on election/voting-related information sources, we may also create other sets of data for the same purpose also using mix and match fronts and backs.
As for feedback our concerns regard font, size, readibility, places to leave them, etc.
On the front, "ballot evidence" is used because it's unlikely those two words will be erradicated from any legal dictionary. Paper trail means nothing legally and something legal must take it's place. Attention is drawn to certain words on the back because not all are in a legal dictionary, and because so many people don't seem to understand how they fit into current events definitionally.
Also, I began captioning links for website use and ran out of time so I could finish something else. Captions are unncessary for the cards though, so listed below are those we came up with so far.
http://www.lionsgrip.com/voting2004map10.htmlhttps://voteprotect.org/index.php?display=EIRMapNationMaps for locating voting irregularities.
http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdfPreserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio (102 pages)
http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/electionobjectionstmt1605.pdfhttp://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/correspondence/letters.htmlhttp://holt.house.gov/issues2.cfm?id=5996 Don't fall for it as it is. Each point is addressed respectively:
http://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevoteFAQ.htmWishlist from an IT auditor.
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_mulligan.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_katz.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_wq_sjl.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_eff.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_vvf.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_buell.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_acm-sigchi.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_camp.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_acm-sigchi.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_camp.pdfhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/cstb/project_evoting_simons.pdfFYI: The National Research Council is part of the National Academies, which also comprise the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology and health policy advice under a congressional charter. Read this whitepaper as objectively as possible. Compare to HAVA and the Rush Holt bill and be careful what you take to heart.
http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htmHow The Electoral College Works
http://www.notablesoftware.com/evote.htmlThe Mercuri method
http://avirubin.com/vote/analysis/index.htmlAnalysis of an Electronic Voting System
http://www.australianpolitics.com/voting/systemsVoting Systems – Australian method
http://www.fvap.gov/links/statelinks.htmlSecretaries of State and/or Directors of Elections
http://uscountvotes.orgA group of independent mathematicians and statisticians has formed a new, volunteer scientific research project to objectively investigate the accuracy of elections in America.
http://www.gregpalast.comhttp://www.ecotalk.orghttp://dream.sims.berkeley.edu/~jhall/nqb2/index.php?cat=52http://www.eff.org/Activism/E-voting/#info-sheetshttp://www.appliedresearch.ushttp://www.blackamericaweb.com/site.aspx/bawnews/cbc106http://www.blackboxvoting.comhttp://www.breakfornews.comhttp://www.caseohio.orghttp://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevotedemo.htmhttp://www.civilrightsproject.harvard.edu/research/electoral_reform/residual_ballot.phphttp://www.commondreams.orghttp://www.counterpunch.orghttp://www.democracynow.orghttp://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Election_Centerhttp://www.dogskinreport.comhttp://www.freepress.orghttp://www.gnn.tv/articles/article.php?id=1038http://www.gregpalast.comhttp://www.helpamericarecount.orghttp://www.indyvoter.orghttp://www.legitgov.orghttp://www.pacifica.org/programs/election2004/20041204-OhioVoteControversySpecial.htmlhttp://www.punkvoter.comhttp://www.newshounds.ushttp://www.nvri.orghttp://www.shuartfarm.fsnet.co.uk/government/evoting/caltech_1.htmhttp://www.thealliancefordemocracy.orghttp://thomhartman.comhttp://www.truthout.orghttp://www.usccr.govhttp://www.ustogether.orghttp://www.verifiedvoting.orghttp://www.velvetrevolution.ushttp://www.votersunite.comhttp://watchingthewatchers.orghttp://www.wheresthepaper.org/links.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._presidential_election_controversy_and_irregularitieshttp://www.yuricareport.com/ElectionAftermath04/DirectoryElectionFraud.html