Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BradBlog - NY TIMES: 'Counting of Votes is a Public Trust'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 08:43 PM
Original message
BradBlog - NY TIMES: 'Counting of Votes is a Public Trust'


NY TIMES: 'Counting of Votes is a Public Trust, Diebold Doesn't Get It'

Op/Ed Slams Diebold, Though Elsewhere in Paper it's Still Nothing More Than 'Conspiracy Theories'

by Brad

12/18/2005

"The counting of votes is a public trust. Diebold, whose machines count many votes, has never acted as if it understood this."

So writes the NY Times correctly in a very good Op/Ed in today's Sunday paper. The piece smartly summarizes the bad week for Diebold and their years-long failure to understand the importance of the role they have been entrusted with in participating in our public elections process. We appreciate the coverage, if only because paper's news side didn't devote any ink, as far as we know, to Diebold's growing troubles all week long.

snip

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002174.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently, you haven't read the fine print ...
... included by the current Administration, to whit:

"'Counting of Votes is a Public Trust - offer void where prohibited by law, some restrictions may apply, offer not available in all states, please check local listings ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes. And, "This vote may be monitored". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. And one year later the NYTimes is going to print a real story about votes
Why do I get the feeling that we are going to hear something revealing from the NYTimes in about a year's time after the 2006 election that could have made a decided difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC