Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebold says its voting machines are bulletproof. (Oct 19, 2005 article )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:41 PM
Original message
Diebold says its voting machines are bulletproof. (Oct 19, 2005 article )


News
Knocking the Vote
Diebold says its voting machines are bulletproof. Hackers say otherwise.
By James Renner

Published: Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Ion Sancho wants to get things right this time. As supervisor of elections for Leon County, Florida, he stood at the epicenter of the election fiasco of 2000. Voter confidence, he realizes, is paramount. That's why he's let a computer hacker have a go at one of his new machines.


The apparatus in question is the Accuvote 2000 Optical Scan, a boxlike computer that reads ballots as they are inserted. The data is collected and stored on a memory card that's later uploaded into a central tabulator. Diebold, the machine's Canton-based manufacturer, claims that the memory cards cannot be altered to influence votes. Sancho figured he'd find out for himself.

In May, he gave Dr. Herbert Thompson access to an Accuvote 2000. As hackers go, Thompson doesn't quite fit the mold of a pasty-faced kid playing Warcraft in Mom's basement: He's the chief strategist at Security Innovation, a Florida tester of online security for IBM, Microsoft, Google, and other large businesses and government agencies. If anyone can uncover a problem, it's this guy.

But not even Thompson could have expected this: He was able to manipulate a memory card using homemade devices. When he inserted it into the Diebold machine, 10,000 votes were awarded to one candidate, and the Accuvote detected no sign of fraud.

http://www.clevescene.com/Issues/2005-10-19/news/news.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't care if they can withstand a speeding bullet. Are they
hack proof? That's the question, and I think it has been answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. And they mean that, literally.
So I suppose we should vote by firing small arms onto the old optical scanner ballot sheets.

It would add such a nice Texian flair to the elections down here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would give me great pleasure...
...to test the Diebold theory. Not only with my .410, but with my keyboard as well.

Damn, how come computer experts are having all the fun? Let me at one of those vote stealing idiot boxes.

Hey, kster! Whatcha' think of this new slogan: Stolection 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Its got a nice ring to it "Stolection 2004"
I may borrow it some time. It sounds like whats been happening with the elections, (stolections - selections)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Okay, then let's shoot them...
:evilgrin: and then we will know for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ya, they can sell them to the gun ranges for targets
thats about all they will be good for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Dammit, you beat me to the punchline. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Take 1 decent hacker and 1 election cycle
and you'll have a hacked machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaryllis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bottom line is it doesn't matter if they are hack proof or not. Private
corporations have no buiness counting votes in a democracy, nor does secret vote counting on proprietary software have any place in a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC