Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New! Diebold Pulls Out of NC But Offers to Help Change the Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:14 AM
Original message
New! Diebold Pulls Out of NC But Offers to Help Change the Law

Don't miss this new story at VoteTrustUSA ... more info on Diebold's NC maneuver!

Diebold Pulls Out of NC But Offers to Help Change the Law
By Warren Stewart, Director of Legislative Issues and Policy, VoteTrustUSA
December 22, 2005

In a surprising reversal, Diebold has notified the North Carolina State Board of Elections that they are withdrawing from the procurement process in the state. They also offered their assistance in "revising" the state's recently passed election laws to better suit their product. Just yesterday, a Superior Court had dismissed a challenge to the Board's decision to certify Diebold in spite of their failure to disclose third party software as required by State Law 2005-323.

Last month, Diebold had lost a bid for a judgement that would have exempted them from placing their software in escrow. In spite of this decision, the State Board of Election proceded to certify Diebold anyway on December 1, the action which prompted the lawsuit that was dismissed this week. However, in bestowing the "immaculate certification" on Diebold, the board had required the vendor to place a copy of their software with a holding company in Raleigh by today.

While the company's statement focused on third-party software, Diebold's tenacious refusal to escow their source code may be motivated by their reluctance to sign off on a statement that says the software in escrow is the same software that is on the machines. Such a declaration, and Diebold's failure to adhere to it, was the cause of their initial decertification in California in 2004. However, unlike California and other states, such a violation of North Carolina's escrow requirements is a felony, and while Diebold has been willing to install uncertified software to count votes, they apparently are less willing to risk criminal penalties in doing so.

<more ... more ... more> http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=618&Itemid=30

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. NO Diebold we like the law that requires OPEN SOURCE CODE
what's the matter with that huh? You afraid to show us the insides of your machines eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC