The fix is already in for 2008: Moscow Times

I posted this in GD Politics also so we wouldn't just be preaching to the choir, so please kick this thread and that one.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2494284

I can't get the link to the article to work here. Works fine when I click on it from the email where it was sent to me. Tried recopying and pasting and still can't make it work. Can anyone help?

The Moscow Times
Global Eye

Party Hacks

By Chris Floyd
Published: March 3, 2006

Two weeks ago, an obscure, unelected, Republican-appointed official in California decided the future of the world. That future -- at least for the next several years -- will be an accelerating nightmare of war, corruption, repression, atrocity and terror. That's because the loyal apparatchik has, with the stroke of a pen, guaranteed the perpetuation of the Bush faction in power in 2008 and beyond.

<snip>

After Diebold's machines failed miserably in a battery of tests last year, McPherson vowed to put their certification on hold until his own hand-picked panel of experts had fine-combed the system to a fare-thee-well, blogger Brad Friedman reports. The panel delivered their conclusions last month -- and the results were staggering, far beyond the worst fears of the most hard-core "conspiracy theorist." The panel found that Diebold's machines were riddled with curious built-in glitches that effectively "ceded complete control of the system" to hackers who could "change vote totals, modify reports, change the names of candidates and change the races being voted on."

<snip>

Naturally, after such a blistering condemnation, McPherson did what any official charged with guaranteeing the integrity and credibility of his state's elections would do: He approved the slipshod system by the dark of the moon, on a Friday before a holiday weekend, without any public hearings -- indeed, without waiting for the results of a pending federal review of Diebold's mole-infested code. Now, the Diebold contraptions, whose chronic "breakdowns" have featured in numerous contested elections and last-second "miracle" victories by Republican candidates across the country in recent years, will control California's pot of electoral gold.

A good example of how this control works can be found in Alaska. There, the state Democratic Party has long been seeking an audit of some of the 2004 Diebold-counted returns, which produced a series of strange anomalies -- including awarding President George W. Bush an extra 100,000 votes that turned out to be phantoms. First, state officials blocked the request because that information, the vote count of a public election, was a "company secret" that belonged exclusively to Diebold, Friedman reports. Then they decided that the returns could be examined -- but only on the condition that Diebold and the Republican officials be allowed to "manipulate the data" before it was released. In the end, even this tainted transparency was too much for the Bushist ballot crunchers; late last month, Alaska officials suddenly declared that examining the returns would pose a dire but unspecified "security risk" to the state.

America's votes are increasingly controlled by a small number of interrelated corporations: Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia, all of which have close political and financial ties to the Bush faction -- and to other dark forces as well. Diebold and ES&S were both bankrolled by tycoon Howard Ahmanson, who was also a major funder of the Christian "Reconstructionist" movement, which openly advocates a totalitarian theocracy in America, including the death penalty for homosexuals, slavery for debtors, stoning for sinners and stripping nonbelievers of citizenship. As journalist Max Blumenthal reports, these extremists have been welcomed as a key part of the Bushist base of politicized evangelicals, whose cadres have been quietly filling government posts for the past five years. Meanwhile, Sequoia -- whose machines racked up 100,000 "mistakes" in just one Florida county in 2004, according to a recent audit -- is owned by a business partner of the Carlyle Group, the investment firm whose insider deals and war profiteering have earned millions for the Bush family.

For the rest:

http://context.themoscowtimes.com/story/166395/


The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.
Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.

Page cannot be found


HTTP 404 - File not found
Internet Explorer

Is it my computer or is it not there now?

but I cannot get it to work from the main post and I don't have a clue why!

some reason, even if I copy and paste, it turns into a dead link!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2494284

that link works. Excellent article.

Should be front page, top of the fold NYT but where do we have go to find the news? How ironic it all is.

Let D = Dem-Voter Type:Short-integer
Let R = Rep-Voter Type:Long-integer



For every 1000 votes:

D = D - 1
R = R + 1

Loop

that we cannot assume free, fair, and honest elections.

We haven't had them since, well, since before 2000.

I get so angry at people who keep on blissfully assuring us that Democrats will make gains in 2006 because, after all, the party out of power always makes gains at this point in the presidential cycle, and besides Bush's approval ratings are lower than sludge.

He had approval ratings below 50% prior to the 2004 "election" and Democrats, from Kerry on down, just rolled over when Ohio was stolen. Oh, don't get me wrong. I, for one, along with many others here complained bitterly, but we have absolutely no influence on those who accepted the theft.

There will be all kinds of "explanations" on November 8th to explain why Republicans did so well, picking up a few extra seats, state houses, and governorships. And most people will buy the lies.

I've said it over, and over again, that those currently in power came to power in a coup, and such people NEVER give up power willingly, least of all in a free, fair, and honest election.

:hug:

Frustrating doesn't begin to describe it.

Too many smart, well-educated people who should know better, just don't know how to think critically.

Or should I?