Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Hampshire E-Voting Mess

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:23 AM
Original message
New Hampshire E-Voting Mess
http://www.cvspectator.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=8&ArticleID=387

Attorney General seizes Grafton ballots; results all in question after many counted twice

GRAFTON — The New Hampshire Attorney General’s office came to Grafton Wednesday and seized the 369 ballots cast during voting Tuesday and the machine used to count them, after an unknown number of ballots were counted multiple times, according to Town Clerk Mary McDow.

The president of the company that makes the voting machines said operator error, not mechanical problems, put the results of all the town’s elections and warrant articles in question.

But Town Moderator Bonnie Haubrich said readings from the machine never indicated there was a problem.

<snip>

“There’s not much I can tell you except that the counts are way off. They all could be switched for all we know,” McDow said. “I had no knowledge of this (Tuesday) night. It’s all the moderator that deals with the machine.”

<snip>

Haubrich said she did read the machine’s printouts, but they didn’t indicate that the machine had counted those ballots. It wasn’t until after the results were recorded and reported to the media that she realized the tallies didn’t match up with the number of ballots cast.


I’m concerned about an attorney general, who claims that there’s nothing wrong with the vote count, but confiscates the ballots. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Poster Child For Voter Confidence Resolution
"They all could be switched for all we know" = "No basis for confidence in the results reported."

The Voter Confidence Resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R..........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Is there a cross-post of this in the New Hampshire State forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'll cross post it now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Operator error = 100% bullshit
It's design error. Part of the design process is (or ought to be) enough real world testing to determine the most likely errors in practice, and then change the design to make those errors either not possible or easy to recover from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But...but...but...
That could wind up causing ballot definition audits, election audits, public disclosure, open software, my, oh my.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC