Electionline is a bit staid. As such, I'm surprised to see them run this story on today's news list . You see, the article publication date is March 24, 2006, so why'd they list it today?
Oh. By the way... Humboldt: VCC Rejects Results of CA PrimarySaved by VotePAD?
Low-tech disabled-accessible voting device pursued despite Diebold certificationFriday, March 24, 2006
By Charles Douglas
HUMBOLDT SENTINEL
EUREKA – Election insiders and voting security critics alike seemed relieved at the Mar. 2 Elections Advisory Committee confab as a new disabled-accessible balloting apparatus, the Voting-on-Paper Assistive Device (VotePAD), was introduced. Their reaction led Clerk/Recorder Carolyn Crnich to recommend to the Board of Supervisors on Friday they spend nearly $214,000 to purchase the VotePAD system, with hopes of being reimbursed with federal funds made available by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).
snip
Local activists from the Voter Confidence Committee, while celebrating the decision not to purchase new Diebold machines, still had questions regarding the continuing use of the AccuVote optical scan ballot system, preferring hand-counted ballots.“The primary objection is that our votes are recorded by optical scanners that use illegal interpreter code,” Voter Confidence Committee organizer Dave Berman stated on his GuvWurld blog (guvwurld.blogspot.com). “There is no basis for confidence in the results reported once the date has been converted into the non-human readable, proprietary AccuBasic programming language of Diebold…while VotePAD is far superior to touch screen machines, the method of counting renders it a false alternative.”
snip
Her initial estimate of $175,000 was exceeded by the eventual purchase price of $213,980 ($199,515 plus tax), but
far less than early estimates of installing a similar number of TSX machines from Diebold as earlier recommended by Crnich.snip
http://www.humboldtsentinel.com/060324f.htm