Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calif. GOP seeks to mobilize volunteers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:11 AM
Original message
Calif. GOP seeks to mobilize volunteers
This is an important article because this is how the Republicans will spin how they
managed to 'win' California in 2006 - they 'got out the vote'.

The voting machines are in place - we will loose 52% to 48% (or there abouts) in every important race.

I think the only solution is for us is 'election revolution' - demand that each county prove the vote count. If that means storming the Board of Elections - so be it.




............................................
Jun 10, 8:07 PM EDT

Calif. GOP seeks to mobilize volunteers

By MICHAEL R. BLOOD
Associated Press Writer


AP Photo/STEVE YEATER


LOS ANGELES (AP) -- State Republicans hope to mobilize more GOP volunteers than ever before to help Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger win re-election, a strategy modeled on get-out-the-vote drives that helped President Bush capture swing states in 2004.

Party insiders say as many as 90,000 people could be enlisted in the closing days of the race to knock on doors, plant yard signs or make telephone calls to connect with potential voters, an unprecedented figure in a state thick with Democrats.

The point on election day: "The world is run by who shows up," said Rod Nehring, vice chairman of the state GOP.

The turnout operation - which could cost as much as $25 million - is being assembled by William Christiansen, a state GOP operative whose get-out-the-vote program for the 2004 Bush campaign in Arizona helped deliver a 10-point victory in that state. Former Bush strategists also are in charge of Schwarzenegger's re-election campaign.


More: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GOVERNORS_RACE_SCHWARZENEGGER?SITE=AZTUS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pot stirring. ONLY 30 Something % showed up to vote!! Get over it.
If you don't show up in numbers that approach even a third of the voters (for both parties).. there is not way to say the vote was stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Are you asking me to get over something?
I guess I do not understand your post.

It does not matter what percentage of voters turn out - election fraud is election fraud. And the GOP will say that their get out the vote 'won' CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 30% is the pathetic thing. If Dems vote in numbers and the turnout
on election day is 70%, then the GOP cannot steal elections. Yes there is voter suppression. And we have to fight that every way. But don't pick a pathetic turnout to be the poster child for speculation.

That teaches apathy. And apathy is Karl Rove's friend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. IMHO this will not work this time for Gropinator
he is just not liked enough to push the vote his way with machines....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exit polls showed Kerry winning in 2004 -
translation - Bush too was not liked enough. Once again election fraud...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. California is the next Ohio (and Florda) - If California falls, 2008 is
THEIRS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've read dozens and dozens of similar online articles since late 2001
Regarding GOP emphasis and sophistication in GOTV. Inevitably, the reponse on DU, and by the local Democrats, is denial, similar to the quote in the article linked atop this thread: "They are in a fantasy world," said Sam Rodriguez, political director of the state Democratic Party. Democrats, who rely heavily on thousands of union foot soldiers each election to reach voters, scoffed at the GOP's ambitious get-out-the-vote plan.

I've worked GOTV the last three cycles on election day, primarily driving vans to the polls. But my dad volunteered weeks ahead of time in Miami in 2004, a high populus suburban area. His report left me convinced we're further behind in GOTV than we want to believe. The leader of that GOTV grid quit with a week to go. My 71 year old dad with zero previous experience was put in charge. He said the lists they were dealing with were innacurate and incomplete to the point of absurdity. During canvassing he said it was miraculous if 50% of the names matched the listed addresses. He said the canvassers were complaining they were being turned away at one house after another since a Republican lived there, not the Democrat on the list. On election day at an elementary school, many of the poll workers didn't show up and the ones who did were not properly trained, and generally clueless.

Understand, this was in Miami, a Democratic stronghold in a vital state, one Kerry pinpointed along with Ohio as must-haves. If we're not coordinated and sophisticated there I wonder what it's like elsewhere?

This isn't the first time I've mentioned my dad's experience on DU. It may not be representative but several posters have replied to my posts recently, ones where I worry about Republican GOTV strength this November, insisting I'm wacko and pessimistic and that we are still dominant, if not increasingly superior, in GOTV. Frankly, I think we're in semi- freefall. Republicans undeniably have the cash advantage and now they've figured out where to spend it, in ground and contact emphasis, not merely TV saturation.

The linked article mentions an operative who was in charge of Arizona 2004, now put in charge of California this year. That didn't surprise me, similar to Ralph Reed leading GOTV in the entire south during 2004 after his success in Georgia 2002. Look at the Arizona numbers, compared to the national average:

Arizona:
'88: Bush (59.95 - 38.74) = + 13.49% Republican
'92: Bush (38.47 - 36.52) = + 7.51% Republican
'96: Clinton (46.52 - 44.29) = + 6.30% Republican
'00: Bush (51.02 - 44.73) = + 6.80% Republican
'04: Bush (54.87 - 44.40) = + 8.01% Republican

It may not look like much, but pre-election conventional wisdom had Arizona closer in 2004 than previously. We have a Democratic governor there and the demographics appear to be trending our way. I expected Arizona 2004 to turn maybe 1 point our way. Yet Arizona soared to 54.87% for Bush and the GOP gained 1.21% in the partisan index from 2000. Contrast that to the two most similar states, New Mexico and Nevada, both won by Bush but the partisan index swung toward Democrats in 2004, 4 points in Nevada and 2 points in New Mexico.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC