Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eureka T-S Balances Facts With Official Blather

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 10:49 AM
Original message
Eureka T-S Balances Facts With Official Blather
http://wedonotconsent.blogspot.com/2006/06/eureka-t-s-balances-facts-with.html

Eureka T-S Balances Facts With Official Blather

This "he-said, she said" reporting is so old (see below). I want a sit-down with Times-Standard editor Charles Winkler, and others around here. They can't keep offsetting the position of the election integrity community with moving lips from the elections department and expect this to wash. Sending machines home is a violation of chain of custody provisions because the memory cards are not secure and the equipment can be in the possession of fewer than two people. The tamper seals are effectively useless. Cards can be tampered with even when sealed in the machines, and the machines have other means of access besides the card ports. These are verifiable facts (.pdf). The media seem as disinterested in doing the verifying here as they do when it comes to determining the accuracy of the vote count. And have we had enough of the excuses from the elections department saying there is not enough people or space to do the hand counting? If they thought it was important enough they would make it work. Clearly this is not their aim. If the elections department is not going to prioritize a transparent, secure and verifiably accurate count, what exactly do we have them for? If newspapers are going to print that procedures are legal, because the state says so, without regard for the information showing the state is behaving lawlessly, then what do we have either the state or the media for? They are acting as one.


http://www.times-standard.com/local/ci_3958659 (archive)

Article Launched: 06/20/2006 04:15:18 AM PDT

Election critic challenges county
James Faulk The Times-Standard

But election official cites safeguards, established procedures

EUREKA -- Citing the fact that Humboldt County's voting machines were sent home with election officials before the vote, a local election advocate claims the results cannot be trusted.

Dave Berman of the Voter Confidence Committee has long maintained that the voting machines used by the county are illegal, and that they were improperly certified by the secretary of state.

(snip)

Humboldt County Elections Officer Lindsey McWilliams said the county has two choices -- either let the voting machines sit unsupervised in the polling places for days, or let elections officials take them home before dispersing them to the various precincts prior to the vote.

"We find it to be more secure and trustworthy to give them to an election official who is responsible for its safety and security and who also charges the battery before taking it to the polls,"” said McWilliams.

(snip)

"The handling procedures require that the devices have security seals attached and that's what we've done,"” he said. "We've got logs of it."”

MORE...


The good thing is the article does conclude with a mention of the CEPN press release and the San Diego situation, although it does not specifically convey the No Confidence position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're going to "he said/she said" us right into a Stalinist death camp.
He: "They voted for him!" She: "Did not." He: "Pravda says so. 99.9% for Josef Stalin." She: "I think that's a lie." He: "Prove it!" She: "They won't let anybody near the vote counting." He: "See, you can't prove it. You have no evidence. You think Uncle Joe has to steal votes? You're just a conspiracy theorist!" She: "I give up. I'm going to get out of here, and sneak across the border, and go to America."

Sad, sad. This just made me very sad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-20-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Guv....NGU
Seems I remember that HAVA led us to believe that 'images' of each ballot were to be stored in the machines?

Two things: have those images been erased?

If not erased, is there a law that says you can't look 'em over?

If erased, did they break the law by erasing those 'images'?

Anyway, seems like time for a HAVA complaint, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC