|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:21 PM Original message |
Nearly 15 point shift from last night's polls to today's vote, with unaudited Diebold scanners? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaiilonfong (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:23 PM Original message |
Well get it out I just did n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaiilonfong (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well get it out I just did n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyedyeto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Doesn't seem possible.... until you figure out who's...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm sure it must be cheering up all those "depressed" Neocons who'd love Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
85. That would explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yeah what the hell is going on here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. You think Obama might be getting a crash course on the evils of e-voting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. No, I don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. Maybe this will be his wake up call, but then again, maybe not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #32 |
86. Forget about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #86 |
123. The corporate capitalist masters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. I am sure Obama will demand a recount |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
51. if he actually were so inclined- that would be an exceedingly BAD idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 06:10 AM Response to Reply #51 |
77. How convenient is it that the law requires the loser to demand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:59 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
52. Either Kucinich, or a voters' group should call for closer scrutiny in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emlev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #52 |
110. Done. By Velvet Revolution (see post) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
6. I heard on CNN that the majority of N.H. Democratic voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. It's a miracle! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shoopnyc (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm a Hillary supporter but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. from Democracy for NH: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. The fuckers changed their name!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Their stock is tanking and their election division is hurting their "good" name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #24 |
58. just keep calling it Diebold. our scanners still say Diebold on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. James Carville in 2004 was VERY concerned how New Hampshire was going. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
48. yeah.. a Hillary supporter who thinks someone rigged the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiberius (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #48 |
56. What if someone else rigged it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
121. they all decided for Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaptBunnyPants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #48 |
138. Weren't the exit polls adjusted by the election results? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. I thought the polls only opened today? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
9. 20 point shift!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Hillary must have had Tinkerbell sprinkle some stardust on Obama voters as they slept . nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. Changed it to 15. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'd love to hear what Democracy for NH has to say about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. NH is small, certainly the folks there will have a feel like we did in Ohio after '04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. It' won't be easy but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Nancy is on some of the same list servs that I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. Sheesh, haven't you guys studied what happened in 2000, and 2004 with these voting machines?. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. We all should have WHAT?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
144. Republicans rigged machines to steal elections; there is NO EVIDENCE of Democrats' having done so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
15. I wonder if the Iranian thing is serving as a smokescreen for this fiasco. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Iran, Bhutto, Osama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
18. Let me guess, values voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. either that or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. they like her, they really like her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:34 AM Response to Reply #28 |
76. I've seen this movie before...I don't care for the ending . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
30. K & R. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
31. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
33. Flashback to 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalMandrake (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #33 |
57. the candidate playing the role of who is supposed to lose: Dean (vs. Kerry), Kerry (vs. Bush), Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
35. If the vast right wing conspiracy had rigged the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveAmerica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Hasn't McCain been voting just as Bushco wants him to? Hillary and supporters are also surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Stop making sense.. (they won't like it on these conspiracy threads!). n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donailin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
49. no . .they want guliani |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #35 |
88. It's not right wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #35 |
100. Funny, Romney was the only Republican that did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L.A.dweller (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
132. McCain will do just fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. I wonder if any voters' groups can challenge this election based on the exit polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #36 |
55. The exit polls had it too close to call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #55 |
89. No, too close to call is exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #55 |
140. The raw data at 5:30 that night showed Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #140 |
148. At 8:00 PM sharp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #148 |
151. That was the weighted poll, not raw data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 06:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
78. No one BUT a candidate can call for a recount in NH. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
38. And Edwards numbers were static at 17 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:34 AM Response to Reply #38 |
90. very strange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
39. "It's not who votes that counts. It's who counts the votes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
40. Stolen stolen stolen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Sour grapes sour grapes sour grapes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Yeah and Gore didn't win, neither did Kerry and there's been no politization of the DoJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #45 |
99. How can it be sour grapes when the person's candidate is not involved? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #99 |
114. Well said n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #45 |
153. It's not sour grapes - it's common sense to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
143. So you're saying there are criminal Democratic elements hacking computers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
41. Kick. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
42. I smell the waft of big fat gellatinous rotting fish too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
43. oh yes! Hillary's supporters have access to the County property... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. You obviously don't understand our voting system. Maybe you should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #54 |
137. Just because something COULD have been done (giving benefit of the doubt) doesn't = |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
44. Oh and the poll I saw today has Hillary nationally ahead by 9 points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
50. Don't forget the polls were Right for Repukes ! And last minute deciders split !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
53. I smell a rat too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
59. Rove left the White House right before all these races got heated up. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
60. This smells to heaven. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
61. It's time to grab a baseball bat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emlev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
62. BRAD BLOG's on the case! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
63. Thats the problem having Paper Ballots, and not counting ALL of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
64. Sour grapes much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #64 |
129. Shut Your Pie Hole n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:43 AM Response to Original message |
65. Certain polls had Obama up by as little as 5% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:53 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. One poll at that link and you picked the narrowest one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:02 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Why not the narrowest one? The OP chose the broadest one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:03 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Use The Google and search adjusted exit polls. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:04 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Harvey. Why is your profile hidden? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:05 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. It's not hidden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #72 |
133. WTF? I hope you'll not calling him out as a TROLL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #65 |
92. Right, so now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #92 |
111. There is no fucking EVIDENCE of tampering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
127. If Hillary wins they won't need to engage in fraud this November. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Corporatists like me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #130 |
158. As the mocking caller replied to Savage, when he said that he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #158 |
161. Perhaps you've been listening to Savage too long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #161 |
162. Quite difficult from the UK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #162 |
163. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vickitulsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #111 |
152. HK, I've seen you around here for a long time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #111 |
159. Hey, dumbo. White-collar fraud is proved on the basis of circumstantial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #159 |
160. People like you give material to those who caricature lefties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
66. The creepiest part is listening to the anchors throw themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 06:27 AM Response to Reply #66 |
79. Like watching a synchrnized swimming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
67. I can understand the polls being off by a few a points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:59 AM Response to Original message |
69. Can you say "We're fucked?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:04 AM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Can you say "President McCain"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #69 |
94. The "something wrong" was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
75. Or the polls after Iowa were bunk, and it was a fake comeback |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
80. This would have more credibility if the Obamites had mentioned it BEFORE the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #80 |
125. How about Jan 5th - and I'm not a big Obama fan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
81. Good thing there aren't any paper ballots that can be checked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moodforaday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #81 |
96. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
83. If anything swayed the vote inappropriately toward Hillary, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
84. I said this in another thread but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NobleCynic (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #84 |
142. Because without people actually out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
87. ** THE EXIT POLLS WERE ACCURATE ** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #87 |
93. It's ALL guesswork |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #93 |
95. I agree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #93 |
108. but you cite polls in your OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #108 |
112. I didn't say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #87 |
126. I guess I'll ask you the same question I asked OTOH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #87 |
136. After what I saw in 2004, I'm supposed to believe exit polls? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #87 |
139. Matthews revealed exit poll raw data for 5:30pm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patiod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
91. I think people act differently when they get in the booth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
97. Diebold rigged the primary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:25 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. The fact is we just don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #98 |
102. Keep it honest for God's Sake! Haven't we seen enough??? Remember 2000????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #102 |
145. Have you posted this concern before now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #98 |
105. I'm very curious.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Media types were saying last night that the Obama events |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #105 |
113. My gut feeling doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #113 |
118. It's funny, I dont remember reading anything yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
101. what do you mean "unaudited?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #101 |
116. Unuaudited means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #116 |
124. why can't the paper ballots be counted in a recount? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #124 |
135. they can, but there is no recount! that's the point: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vickitulsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #135 |
154. Wouldn't such an audit also take less time and be less costly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 06:17 AM Response to Reply #135 |
157. well then that has nothing to do with Diebold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
103. Don't worry--Tweety will figure out how Hillary stole the election! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
104. I've had my hat on since Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
106. A possible explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #106 |
115. Except wouldn't we have seen a spike in McCain's numbers? The only numbers that switched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #115 |
122. Maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
109. You know it almost doesn't matter that if it was a fix... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #109 |
117. well unfortunately HBO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
119. What happened to the "bussed them in" conspiracy theories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
120. K*R What's wrong with asking questions? Your's are very good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
128. Sheeple have been expertly conditioned not to question anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
131. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam kane (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Edison/Mitofsky did the exit poll that was fixed to match the 2000 "results." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #134 |
146. E-M poll: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
141. Hardball revealed that raw data from exit poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
147. Kick. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
149. Diebold is now named Premier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
150. So are you suggesting that someone fixed the outcome for Clinton? Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bonito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #150 |
155. This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
156. Yeah GW is a Hillary fan too....50 states in 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC