31 family members voted for Ron Paul and NOTHING showed up

I know this is Alex Jones and Bev Harris but I don't care!!!

New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008



The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?

"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.
"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.
"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."
With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.
http://www.politicalhotwire.com/18546-new-hampshire-district-admits-ron-paul.html

not machine error, human error.

rigged voting the old fashioned way. This is why recounts are always a good idea.

the counts are done at a precinct level. You all believe that there are 1000's of New Hampshire citizens participating in an effort to steal the race from Obama.

Don't think much of your fellow citizens.

BTW, I agree with you that rigged elections occurred long before there were voting machines.
But if you think there is any large process in this country that is errorless, you are kidding yourself.

and the sole reason I want a recount is that there were some suspicions about the vote tally-- now,apparently, from both sides.

until you really need it.

Like Harry Reid! I love it!

Was this satire? If not...

:rofl:

in that people on right are finally realizing that voting can be rigged against them, too. Diligence from both sides will help us get a fairer vote count, I think.

I can't stand the racist moron but if he serves a purpose, if he highlights the insecurity of our votes and the blatant manipulation, then well done.

if one person in a precinct votes for Crappy McTastic I expect the rolls to show 1 vote for Crappy McTastic.

I haven't laughed out loud like this for a while. Thanks!!!

is why votes must be hand counted IN PUBLIC and posted PUBLICLY at the precinct voting place.

Let them find Rove's cell number on the clerk's rolodex or phone log.

even recounts. Even public, transparent recounts.