|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 08:22 AM Original message |
Science versus Faith. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. My opinion-science is reality, faith is not. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Especially given that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sailor65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. Still the same flawed argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 09:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. How very self-righteous of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sailor65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Kudos for the mischaracterization of the day..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:55 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Then let me ask you this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. good questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Oh, boy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. One of my faves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 12:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 01:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. You're welcome, but DS3 deserves the credit, he introduced me to the Tree Lobsters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
42. What "leap of faith" has anyone ever taken with dark matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Galileo summed it up nicely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Galileo had to suck up to the church if he didn't want to meet the same fate as Giordano Bruno. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Um, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. So just posting random facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 05:55 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Actually I was hoping you would bother to do some of your own research. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. What exactly is your point? Well, if you actually have one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. I was expecting curiousity and/or substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. I guess you would have gotten curiosity if it weren't for the fact that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. I'm not great at quotes either, I save the ones I like best and google the rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I'm not sure that Rebecca Goldstein is raising the usual argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. You've misled people into thinking that the text you quote in the OP is from Goldstein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Only people who are easily misled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Thanks, I caught that after I replied to your post down thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Goldstein is definitely an atheist, though. I think that graph mischaracterizes her position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I was under the impression she was a theist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Could be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 07:18 AM Response to Reply #46 |
60. No. Rebecca Goldstein is an atheist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Still the same equivocating on the definition of "faith". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. +1 squidzillion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
21. Extremely well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 11:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
26. That is a brilliant post and deserves a thread of its own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Hey, thanks guys. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. It sure does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
61. Nice blog. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #61 |
110. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
57. Very fine post...thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Sailor, I think you hit on a very important point. There is a certain level of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Yeah, see #9, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. If by "SM" you mean Scientific Method... no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Actually, you don't know what you are talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Oh, one of you CLEARLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Oh yes, clearly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. The SM is nothing more than an orderly method of creative problem solving. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:03 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. It's a bit more than that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #54 |
67. You seem to be drifting away from your original objection against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I'm really not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 11:27 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Excuse me? You said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #72 |
76. I'm perfectly well aware of what I said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 03:23 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Well done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. You merely restated what I already said and yes I will stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 04:06 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. If you think I restated what you said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. It's pretty obvious that you're reading something and don't have a clue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Uh-huh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 05:43 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. I am well aware of what a SM list looks like. But it's also obvious that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Ahem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. There's hardly any avoidance on my part here. You are the one that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 07:14 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. He says as he avoids answering the question AGAIN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. If you go to the article that I referred you to you will see that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:15 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. ...1. Oh look, prediction fulfilled. My hypothesis is supported by data! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Buddy, I have put the proof right before your eyes. It's not the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. You do understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. I think you had better go argue with Norman then. there are many others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:13 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Why? *You're* right here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. I suspect he doesn't "have the time" to do that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 06:20 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. These things do tend to work out that way, don't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Now that's one atheist who is really a deep thinker. And I ask myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 11:06 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Which is, of course, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 01:03 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Yak, yak, yak... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 01:26 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. I think you were talking to humblebum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #102 |
104. Oops. Yes, that was supposed to be directed elsewhere. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Did you happen to notice that old Norman had an endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Did you happen to notice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 06:37 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Why? And end the comic relief? At no point did I ever say I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 06:49 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-29-10 11:13 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Uh-huh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-30-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #109 |
111. Actually, when I said comic relief, I meant that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. How many false premises can you stuff into one post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Yeah, sure. This is your complex sociological experiment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 01:46 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. You have accused me of trying to obfuscate the main issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. I don't require reminding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 03:49 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. As far as I am concerned, I have more than shown you what it looks like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Such a worthless post, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Yeah, flee. See ya. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. And then the mouse curls into a ball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
4. Science versus ignorance - religion or not - ignorance is widespread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Is your last sentence still talking about scientific knowledge, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
10. What wisdom found in religion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. "whose version of the moral absolute should we believe in?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:42 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I put it at the end of my list of questions, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:58 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Hopefully they won't notice it down here at the bottom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
14. Science and religion use 2 entirely different "ways of knowing" or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #14 |
23. That would be because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
56. And what exactly does "religion" know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
25. LOLOLOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
58. Yes, curse them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
62. "Debates" on the topic "Science versus Faith" seem stale and hackneyed to me: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 08:48 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. What would be rewarding would be to drop the myopia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silent3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 09:15 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Not everything said in public discussion is designed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 11:27 AM Response to Reply #65 |
71. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 09:22 AM Response to Reply #62 |
66. I think it depends on the tone of the debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. "Tone"..."respectful".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 11:13 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Yes, in any intelligent discussion, people should be respectful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. And therein lies your problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. No. I don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 05:07 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Yes, you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. "No, I don't." "Yes, you do." That's pretty much as far as it goes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 05:51 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. Of course it is, if you only read subject lines and want an easy out to the convo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. One can only properly call this a "debate," if one has decided that there are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Except that you've provided a false analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 06:14 AM Response to Reply #73 |
92. There is no denying that there is an ongoing debate on this topic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-27-10 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
64. I haven't read every post here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC