Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DADT: OK....someone explain this BULLSHIT from Bob Gates...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:25 PM
Original message
DADT: OK....someone explain this BULLSHIT from Bob Gates...
...assuming there is some legit explanation:

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates made clear on Thursday that any repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law would have to be undertaken slowly, and suggested that it might not happen at all.

“If we do it,’’ Mr. Gates told reporters on his plane enroute to Rhode Island, “it’s important that we do it right, and very carefully.’’


http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/category/government-politics/military-dont-ask

What the hell??? This to me from Gates translates to: "We need to find a right way to stop being bigots." Sounds just like the BS to me about having African Americans and Whites in separate groups in the military. What total horse manure.

Hey, Bob: Clue #1 ~~ You just fucking repeal the DADT rule, OK? What the hell is there to guess about, think about, plan for??? The right thing to do is to just get rid of DADT. I am concerned that you even have a question about this.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snowdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1.  Whitehouse.gov Backs Down on Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
Have you seen this??


Obama is listening----to his commanders on the ground and Gates.

If you go to the link the changed parts are highlighted in different colors and easy to see.

At the bottom of the article, it also explains this Tracker tool.

http://www.propublica.org/article/whitehouse.gov-backs-down-on-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell-501



Whitehouse.gov Backs Down on Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
by Brian Boyer, ProPublica - May 1, 2009 3:47 pm EDT




May 1: This post has been updated <1>.

Update, May 2: Friday night, Whitehouse.gov reinserted language <2> saying President Obama supports the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. The specific language: "He supports repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and national security."



A subtle but substantive change in the president's position on "don't ask don't tell" was noticed today by our watchful eye-on-the-administration tool, ChangeTracker <3>. An edit to the civil rights issues page <4> tells the tale.


<4>

Previously, the message was clear. As of two days ago, whitehouse.gov said, "We need to repeal the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy." The new version of the page says that the president "supports changing Don't Ask Don't Tell in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security."

In January, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was asked, "Is the new administration going to get rid of the 'don't ask don't tell' policy?" Gibbs proudly gave a one-word answer <5>, "Yes.”

In March, Defense Secretary Robert Gates seemed to back away from that stance <6>. When asked by Fox News about "don't ask don't tell," he said, "I feel like we've got a lot on our plates right now."

The latest changes on whitehouse.gov seem to further that hedge -- and make it the White House position.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is that statement sigificantly different than what the President himself wrote in his note
to 2nd Lt. Sandy Tsao?

Sandy - Thanks for the wonderful and thoughtful letter. It is because of outstanding Americans like you that I committed to changing our current policy. Although it will take some time to complete (partly because it needs Congressional action) I intend to fulfill my commitment. — Barack Obama.


It sounds like Gates is just reiterating the Administration's talking points on DADT, that it will happen but it will take time and it must be done carefully because it will take an act of Congress to change it.

I don't think this waffling on DADT does the President any good, and we all know it doesn't do our military any good to continue to discharge LGBT heroes from the service. The President needs to pressure the House to move on the already proposed bill to end DADT and get it out of committee ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, to me it is:
Obama did NOT say he had to find a right way to get rid of DADT. That is what really, really bothered me from Gates: That there was some "right" way to get rid of something VERY wrong ~~ bigotry and discrimination.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm no fan of Gates, but I see a "right" way and a "wrong" way to end DADT, unfortunately.
The right way would be the way that is completely legal and gets rid of DADT once and for all. The wrong way would be an illegal act or ending it in a way that allows a future bigoted Congress or President to bring it back.

I hope that is what Gates was trying to say, but knowing him I doubt it. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I had not looked at it that way....
...but I can see the alternate meaning you stated. However, I do also agree that Gates probably did not mean that.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The right way
is suspending discharges pending Congressional action. Let the House bill move through and in the meantime, not kick out any more people.

The irony is that racial integration happened by executive order, but some bigoted assholes in Congress felt the need to protect yet another heterosexual privilege through legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. next thing ya know, they'll be wanting to let african-americans in the military nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. All it takes
is an Executive Order, properly drafted. That's all Obama has to do to eliminate DODT.

Chimpy Fucknuts made an art out of the Executive Order power - how come it's not good enough for Obama?

Slowly, my ass....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree....
...get paper, get pen, make order, sign document.

:shrug:

What the heck is the hold up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Translation: We're not doing it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC