Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fate of N.Y.'s same-sex marriage bill hinges on votes of undecided state senators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:41 PM
Original message
Fate of N.Y.'s same-sex marriage bill hinges on votes of undecided state senators
ALBANY — A small group of undecided state senators could determine whether same-sex marriage will become legal in New York, a survey by Gannett's Albany Bureau found.

Eight senators — including the two who represent Dutchess County — indicated they are undecided on whether they would support same-sex marriage legislation if the bill comes to a vote, a survey of all 62 senators found.

The measure would need 32 votes for adoption in the Senate, and 26 senators, all Democrats, indicated they would back the bill. Twenty-eight senators expressed opposition — possibly leaving the measure's fate in the hands of the eight undecided lawmakers, five Republicans and three Democrats.

The senators who have not publicly declared their stance include Sens. Steve Saland, R-Poughkeepsie; Greg Ball, R-Carmel, Putnam County; and James Alesi, R-Perinton, Monroe County. Alesi and Saland voted against the bill in 2009 when it failed by eight votes.

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/BK/20110529/NEWS01/105290395/Fate-N-Y-s-same-sex-marriage-bill-hinges-votes-undecided-state-senators?odyssey=nav|head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ergot Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. 5 GOP, 3 Democrats...does not sound very auspicious.
crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not, at all.
Part of the reason some of those Senators are "undeclared" is because it's beneficial for them to be seen as potential pickups. In that case, pro-marriage groups are more likely to work on lobbying them than replacing them.

Frankly, I don't really expect this to pass unless Cuomo cuts a deal, probably giving up something else like non-partisan redistricting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC