Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New oral HIV test's incorrect results alarm S.F. officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:45 PM
Original message
New oral HIV test's incorrect results alarm S.F. officials
A promising new oral HIV test being considered for home use has produced at least 47 false positives at San Francisco public health clinics, throwing a scare into those who received the results and raising questions about the test's suitability for widespread use in the United States and abroad.

The OraQuick Advance HIV test approved for professional use by the Food and Drug Administration in March 2004 detects in just 20 minutes antibodies to the virus that causes AIDS, using fluid swabbed from the mouth.

Its speed and ease of use make the test a particularly suitable candidate for HIV prevention and treatment efforts that stress frequent testing and speedy access to care for those who test positive.

San Francisco Department of Public Health officials were alarmed last week when their analyses of more than 6,000 oral tests since spring turned up 47 instances in which the results were positive, but follow-up tests showed those patients were not infected.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/12/09/AIDS.TMP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems to me that the number of false negatives would be far more important
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 01:50 PM by ET Awful
I mean, anybody that takes any kind of medical test at home is going to get a follow-up on a positive result (whether it's AIDS, blood sugar, pregnancy, whatever). So yeah, they may be freaked out and stressed, but a false positive isn't THAT big of a deal.

However, a false negative would give a false sense of security, so I'd say that those statistics are far more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True, but that false positive had to scare a few people out of a couple of
years when they first saw it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freestyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Indeed, HIV antibody tests are designed to err on the positive side.
This is based on exactly what you said, a positive results in a confirmatory test using more detailed methods. There are things other than HIV antibodies that can result in a positive result on the initial test. The question is whether people getting their test via OraQuick are counseled as to the possibility of false positives. Rapid testing involves tradeoffs. Many people do not return for their results, so rapid testing could increase the numbers of people who know their serostatus. It could, as the poster below said, scare the hell out of people.

At any rate, everyone should know the risks, know their status, do their best to stay negative if they are and to stay healthy and keep others healthy if they are positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagine My Surprise Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. friend of mine just did the math and said that they are still 99% correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC