it went to the Appeals Court (NY Supreme Court) to interpret whether or not the state constitution means marriage as only a man and a woman orwhether it should include all unions since it is not specific.
The trial level court in Manhattan held that it was unconstitutional under the state constitution to deny us the right to marry. Fucking asshole Bloomberg appealed that ruling and the Appellate Division reversed it. That case and one or two more then went to the Court of Appeals for a final decision on the state constitutional issue.
Everyone was hoping for a positive decision on or before Gay Pride Day. That didn't happen. Now I am worried that it is a negative decision and they withheld it so as not to rain on our parade last weekend. I so hope I'm wrong, but one of the judges who was expected to rule out way recused himself for the stupid reason that his daughter advocates for gay marriage in other states. If there is a tie, the lower court ruling stands.
10. But Scalia is allowed to rule on Bush V. Gore even though....
>>>>but one of the judges who was expected to rule out way recused himself for the stupid reason that his daughter advocates for gay marriage in other states.>>>>
...his son is an *official* with Bush-Cheney campaign organization?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.