Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fish: For little ones, it's anything but brain food

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 05:05 AM
Original message
Fish: For little ones, it's anything but brain food
SMALL children who eat more than one serving a fortnight of certain types of fish are at risk of developing severe learning and behavioural difficulties that could lead to autism, doctors warned yesterday.

A study has found that children under the age of six who regularly eat large, predatory fish, such as shark (which is sold as flake), catfish, snapper or barramundi often have mercury levels up to seven times the safe maximum, which can lead to aggressive and regressive behaviour.

The author of the study, Associate Professor Stephen Corbett, said yesterday that parents needed to remember that, while most types of fish were beneficial in a child's diet if eaten two to three times a week, and could prevent such disorders as anaemia, some were dangerous.

The rule of thumb was "small fish for the small fry", said Professor Corbett, a director of the Centre for Population Health.

In his study, published in The Medical Journal of Australia today, Professor Corbett reported on three Chinese children living in Sydney who had mercury levels up to seven times the maximum safe level. The children, who had all been weaned on fish congee, a type of porridge, had eaten fish up to eight times a week and were being treated for developmental delays or neurological problems.

One, a two-year-old boy being treated for aggressive behaviour, ate salmon, barramundi or snapper at least five times a week and had a mercury level three times the safe level. His father had also been diagnosed with mercury poisoning after complaining of rashes, abdominal pain and diarrhoea.

The second child, a three-year-old boy, had delayed speech development and some autistic behaviour. He had eaten barramundi, sea perch, salmon and rock cod up to eight times a week and had a blood mercury level seven times the safe level.

Within two weeks of removing fish from his diet, this mercury level had dropped to double what it should have been.

The third child, a 15-month-old boy, had eaten ling and salmon about five times a week and had a mercury level three times the safe level.

Professor Corbett said giving babies fish when they were being weaned had health benefits, but congee, if made from large fish species, could exceed the tolerable weekly intake for children.

He said advice about fish consumption needed to be provided in languages other than English to help Asian families understand the dangers.

The chief scientist at the NSW Food Authority, Lisa Szabo, said yesterday that fish high in mercury included flake, swordfish, catfish, marlin, broadbill and orange roughy. Those low in mercury included bream, rainbow trout, ocean trout, flathead, kingfish, whiting, tuna and salmon.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/for-little-ones-its-anything-but-brain-food/2008/01/06/1199554485301.html
---------------

These are of course Australian guidelines and so people will want to look at their own state public health divisions warnings and recommendations.

DHS Environmental Toxicology Program

e.g. Fish Advisories: Consumption Guidelines

http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/envtox/fishconsumption.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Three children is ... kind of a small sample, wouldn't one say? (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. One would certainly like to see some more data before making a conclusion.
What about Japan? Their seafood consumption is among the highest in the world, isn't it? Should be some good data to collect there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. all due to Bu$h redefining words in EPA regulations allowing energy producers to pollute>Link>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC