Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Hot Pursuit of Fusion (or Folly)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 11:00 AM
Original message
In Hot Pursuit of Fusion (or Folly)
LIVERMORE, Calif. — Here in a dry California valley, outside a small town, a cathedral of light is to be dedicated on Friday. Like the cathedrals of antiquity, it is built on an unrivaled scale with unmatched technology, and it embodies a scientific doctrine that, if confirmed, might lift civilization to new heights.

“Bringing Star Power to Earth” reads a giant banner that was recently unfurled across a building the size of a football stadium.

The $3.5 billion site is known as the National Ignition Facility, or NIF. For more than half a century, physicists have dreamed of creating tiny stars that would inaugurate an era of bold science and cheap energy, and NIF is meant to kindle that blaze.

In theory, the facility’s 192 lasers — made of nearly 60 miles of mirrors and fiber optics, crystals and light amplifiers — will fire as one to pulverize a fleck of hydrogen fuel smaller than a match head. Compressed and heated to temperatures hotter than those of the core of a star, the hydrogen atoms will fuse into helium, releasing bursts of thermonuclear energy.

The project’s director, Ed Moses, said that getting to the cusp of ignition (defined as the successful achievement of fusion) had taken some 7,000 workers and 3,000 contractors a dozen years, their labors creating a precision colossus of millions of parts and 60,000 points of control, 30 times as many as on the space shuttle.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/science/26fusi.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Funny how the NYT isn't covering Dr. Nebel's lab
He of the Polywell. On leave from Los Alamos National Labs, Nebel and Co. are attempting to produce a viable fusion reactor for a tiny fraction of the cost reported here.

The idea is the brainchild of the late Dr. Robert Busssard, formerly of the Atomic Energy Commission. His idea uses electrostatic containment in a magnetic field 'cage'. They've already accomplished fusion of helium as a test fuel, and they've received Navy funding to continue the project.

The Polywell design is inexpensive and quite small. If they succeed- and Bussard was certain his power output and power gain scaling laws were correct- it will signal the end of the fossil fuel era.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDFbunny Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Core of the sun is cold, maybe even absolute zero
When I heard this theory from an Italian astronomer things seemed to make more sense. It explains why the sun is cooler the further you look into it. Why a coronal mass ejection reveals a cooler surface, why the photosphere is only 6000k, why the sun holds together.


Think of that toy with 5 steal balls suspended. Swing one stealie into the other and it instantly stops (cold) and that energy travels through the other stealies and the energy is ejected at the end (surface).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC