Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Opinion: ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy has failed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 06:22 AM
Original message
Opinion: ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy has failed
‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy has failed

On Nov. 30, I spoke on the Mall at an event to honor the service of 12,000 patriots who had been discharged from our military under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law. These 12,000 patriots had volunteered to serve their nation and place themselves in harm’s way so that 300 million other Americans could live free.

They were well trained and serving honorably but were rejected by their military services because of their sexual preferences, which are legally protected in every other segment of our society. DADT is a failed policy on three counts: moral, humane and national security.

It is morally wrong because it legitimizes a politically expedient lie of omission that violates military values, such as trust, respect and integrity. What’s the effect of justifying lies of omission in other military affairs?

~snip~

I counter that it didn’t work for the 12,000 patriots discharged because of it, nor does it for the 65,000 currently serving. To the unit cohesion and morale argument, I counter that gays and lesbians serve openly and honorably in the militaries of all our major allies. Why does it work well for them?

I doubt that it’s because young American service members and their junior leaders lack the maturity, humanity and intelligence to serve with and lead gays and lesbians. Perhaps it is because we have a senior leadership that lacks the skill and/or the will to lead an all-volunteer force that, in fact, includes all.

Maj. Gen. Dennis Laich (ret.)
Dublin, Ohio


Rest of article at: http://www.armytimes.com/community/opinion/army_opinion_dadt_080128/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
plantwomyn Donating Member (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you for telling it like it is.
If small changes to the UCMJ were made DADT would be moot. Eliminate sec. 925 act 125. Add to Art 120 the words "anus or mouth" after vulva. This would make any kind of forced and unwanted sex a crime in the military. Sodomy is no longer a crime in the U.S.
unless done by force. Just like any other forms of sex. Art. 125 is not used to discharge heterosexuals in the military. Tell the heterosexuals who are volunteering that they can't get a blow job, NO EVEN FROM THEIR WIFE, until they are discharged and see how well we fill the quotas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC