|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:51 AM Original message |
Army Wants Vets Back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miles55 (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. Guess they can't find enough seasoned people to..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 12:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. or serve as cannon fodder. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AbsoluteArmorer (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1stCav (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-24-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Bush Money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oversea Visitor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
3. More cannonfodder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
4. Is that offer good for the Homeless Vets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Army (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 09:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Up the Bribes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneighty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. In 1968 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 05:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Was the Navy having retention issues back in 1968? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneighty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. No they wanted some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 07:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I was an Army Combat Engineer Officer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneighty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-07-05 07:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. How bout you guys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioNerd (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-29-06 09:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. I was an F.O. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHC (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-21-06 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
11. vet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Acebass (926 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-30-06 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. I can see it now...a 57 year old E-5...yeah right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC